Disputas discursivas, legitimação e desinformação: o caso Veja x Bolsonaro nas eleições brasileiras de 2018

Q4 Social Sciences

Comunicacao Midia e Consumo Pub Date : 2019-12-10 DOI:10.18568/cmc.v16i47.2013

R. Recuero

引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article focuses on the theme of the discursive struggles occurred on Twitter during the presidential election campaign of 2018, particularly in the case of a piece published by Veja on September 28th. The piece reported the divorce process of PSL candidate Jair Bolsonaro. In this news, accusations, corruption, and violence were explicit. We analyze a corpus of 110 original tweets with more than 100 retweets, looking for legitimation strategies used and their impact in disinformation. In the following analysis, we note that the dispute was mainly between news vehicles and the militant support of the candidate. In addition, the anti-Veja discourse that succeeded in the subject used legitimacy strategies based on morality and disinformation to counteract the damage caused.

查看原文本刊更多论文

话语争议、合法化和虚假信息:2018年巴西选举中的Veja x Bolsonaro案例

本文聚焦于2018年总统竞选期间Twitter上的话语斗争主题，特别是Veja于9月28日发表的一篇文章。这篇文章报道了社会党候选人雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗的离婚过程。在这则新闻中，指控、腐败和暴力是显而易见的。我们分析了110条原创推文的语料库，这些推文的转发次数超过100次，寻找所使用的合法化策略及其对虚假信息的影响。在下面的分析中，我们注意到争论主要发生在新闻媒介和候选人的激进支持之间。此外，在主题上取得成功的反veja话语运用了基于道德和虚假信息的合法性策略来抵消所造成的损害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Comunicacao Midia e Consumo Social Sciences-Communication

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

30 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo – Communication, Media and Consumption – is published in printed and digital versions by the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Práticas de Consumo da ESPM-SP – Postgraduate Programme in Communication and Consumption Practices of ESPM-SP – Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing – Superior School of Propaganda and Marketing and it is evaluated as Qualis A2; its editorial line is to approach relevant topics of the field of Communication, understood here as a complex socio-cultural process and practice. The articles must be well-founded and mobilise different authors of a given theoretical tendency so that they develop a critical reflection about the approached thematic topics. In the case of empirical articles, besides the contextualisation and the descriptive stage of the material, we privilege articles which present a theoretico-interpretative of the aspects that are observed in the corpus.