Utopía y derecho: un argumento en favor del reconocimiento de su vínculo

Escritos Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.18566/ESCR.V27N58.A06
L. Misseri
{"title":"Utopía y derecho: un argumento en favor del reconocimiento de su vínculo","authors":"L. Misseri","doi":"10.18566/ESCR.V27N58.A06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main idea of the article is that there is a complementary link between utopia and law. Thus, the purpose is to show, through a conceptual and historical analysis, that denying such a link, at least, means the existence of an unclear and biased view of the concept of utopia and its historical development. For this purpose, it presents a provisional definition of utopia along with two assumptions underlying such definition: an economical and an anthropological one. It also presents a typology of utopias. Based on this, the idea that utopia is both subversive and perfectionist is rejected by acknowledging two different models of utopia: closed and open utopias. It is concluded that possible tensions between utopia and law are overcome by means of an open model of utopia.","PeriodicalId":33029,"journal":{"name":"Escritos","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Escritos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/ESCR.V27N58.A06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main idea of the article is that there is a complementary link between utopia and law. Thus, the purpose is to show, through a conceptual and historical analysis, that denying such a link, at least, means the existence of an unclear and biased view of the concept of utopia and its historical development. For this purpose, it presents a provisional definition of utopia along with two assumptions underlying such definition: an economical and an anthropological one. It also presents a typology of utopias. Based on this, the idea that utopia is both subversive and perfectionist is rejected by acknowledging two different models of utopia: closed and open utopias. It is concluded that possible tensions between utopia and law are overcome by means of an open model of utopia.
乌托邦与法律:承认它们之间联系的论点
本文的主要思想是乌托邦与法律之间存在着一种互补的联系。因此,本文的目的是通过概念和历史分析来表明,否认这种联系,至少意味着对乌托邦概念及其历史发展存在不明确和有偏见的看法。为此,本文提出了乌托邦的临时定义,并提出了两个假设:经济的和人类学的。它也呈现了乌托邦的类型。在此基础上,通过承认两种不同的乌托邦模式:封闭乌托邦和开放乌托邦,否定了乌托邦既是颠覆性的又是完美主义的观点。本文的结论是,乌托邦与法律之间可能存在的紧张关系可以通过乌托邦的开放模式来克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书