Ethnographic Theology: Integrating the Social Sciences and Theological Reflection

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Gerardo Martí
{"title":"Ethnographic Theology: Integrating the Social Sciences and Theological Reflection","authors":"Gerardo Martí","doi":"10.18566/cueteo.v49n111.a13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theologians are widely embracing ethnographic research to accomplish their theological work. However, since most theologians are not substantively trained in social scientific methods, their sophistication with this methodology is limited, leading to distortions in recorded observations and proffered interpretations. This essay seeks to address this lack of depth by articulating some of the most essential sensitivities that are crucial to the best practices associated with exemplary scholarship emerging at the intersection of ethnography and theology. Among the most important distinctions that theologians must recognize is a simple, heuristic distinction between “found theologies” and “imposed theologies”. Ethnographers know that reporting our findings always requires a careful examination of the assumptions that may unwittingly constrain what we recognize, let alone “see.” The distinction offered between “found theologies” and “imposed theologies” serves to remind theologically concerned field workers that unexamined ideals and prejudices as well as deeply held values and convictions can radically direct our attention and creatively reshape our perceptions. It also allows insightful focus on the dynamics of power as well as inclusion of marginalized peoples. My modest goal, therefore, is to further equip theologically-oriented scholars to produce original, social-scientifically conscientious, yet substantively rich and responsible works that further innovate the use of social science methodology among theologians. Ultimately, by further substantiating the ethics of ethnographic practice among theologians, students and scholars will accentuate the integrity of findings and produce streams of scholarship that will foster the unexpected and urgently needed theologies of the future.","PeriodicalId":32990,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Teologicas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Teologicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/cueteo.v49n111.a13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theologians are widely embracing ethnographic research to accomplish their theological work. However, since most theologians are not substantively trained in social scientific methods, their sophistication with this methodology is limited, leading to distortions in recorded observations and proffered interpretations. This essay seeks to address this lack of depth by articulating some of the most essential sensitivities that are crucial to the best practices associated with exemplary scholarship emerging at the intersection of ethnography and theology. Among the most important distinctions that theologians must recognize is a simple, heuristic distinction between “found theologies” and “imposed theologies”. Ethnographers know that reporting our findings always requires a careful examination of the assumptions that may unwittingly constrain what we recognize, let alone “see.” The distinction offered between “found theologies” and “imposed theologies” serves to remind theologically concerned field workers that unexamined ideals and prejudices as well as deeply held values and convictions can radically direct our attention and creatively reshape our perceptions. It also allows insightful focus on the dynamics of power as well as inclusion of marginalized peoples. My modest goal, therefore, is to further equip theologically-oriented scholars to produce original, social-scientifically conscientious, yet substantively rich and responsible works that further innovate the use of social science methodology among theologians. Ultimately, by further substantiating the ethics of ethnographic practice among theologians, students and scholars will accentuate the integrity of findings and produce streams of scholarship that will foster the unexpected and urgently needed theologies of the future.
民族志神学:整合社会科学与神学反思
神学家们广泛地接受民族志研究来完成他们的神学工作。然而,由于大多数神学家在社会科学方法方面没有受过实质性的训练,他们对这种方法的复杂程度是有限的,导致在记录的观察和提供的解释中出现扭曲。这篇文章试图通过阐明一些最重要的敏感性来解决这种缺乏深度的问题,这些敏感性对于在民族志和神学交叉领域出现的模范学术相关的最佳实践至关重要。神学家必须认识到的最重要的区别之一是“发现神学”和“强加神学”之间简单的启发式区别。人种学家知道,报告我们的发现总是需要仔细检查假设,这些假设可能会在不知不觉中限制我们的认识,更不用说“看到”了。“发现神学”和“强加神学”之间的区别,是为了提醒关注神学的实地工作者,未经检验的理想和偏见,以及根深蒂固的价值观和信念,可以从根本上引导我们的注意力,创造性地重塑我们的观念。它还允许深刻地关注权力的动态,并纳入边缘化人民。因此,我的适度目标是进一步装备以神学为导向的学者,使他们能够写出原创的、有社会科学良心的、但实质上丰富而负责任的作品,进一步创新神学家对社会科学方法论的使用。最终,通过在神学家中进一步证实民族志实践的伦理,学生和学者将强调发现的完整性,并产生奖学金流,这将促进未来意想不到的和迫切需要的神学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信