Learners’ Differences in Blended Learner-Centric Approach for a Common Programming Subject

Q2 Social Sciences
Qi Cao, C. Seow, Lily Lim, S. Keoh, Vicki Dale, Sarah Honeychurch, Nathalie Tasler, Duncan Bremner
{"title":"Learners’ Differences in Blended Learner-Centric Approach for a Common Programming Subject","authors":"Qi Cao, C. Seow, Lily Lim, S. Keoh, Vicki Dale, Sarah Honeychurch, Nathalie Tasler, Duncan Bremner","doi":"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.6.1886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the number of students entering higher education increases with a growing diversity of background, educators of programming courses face increasing challenges. Different teaching pedagogies need to be explored for students with different background knowledge. Some students find programming courses difficult to understand and practice. It may lead to de-motivation and disengagement in learning process with consequential impact on their grades. Addressing these issues demands approaches for effective teaching programming courses to multidisciplinary cohorts. This article investigates how computing science (CS) and engineering cohorts respond differently to teaching approaches in a common module, Fundamentals of Programming. Both traditional teacher-centric teaching and a blended learner-centric approach have been explored in a diverse group of students. The blended learner-centric approach combines classroom teaching and self-paced blended learning using work examples videos method. These two teaching approaches have been evaluated in Academic Year 2019/2020. It can be seen from the evaluation results of 92 CS and 150 Engineering students who participate in this research that the performance is improved by about 5% through blended learner-centric approach. It is further observed that quantitatively the performance gap between CS and Engineering students has been reduced. Questionnaire survey has also been conducted with 54 CS and 89 Engineering students being responded. The learners’ perceptions of the blended learner-centric approach have also been compared between these two cohorts.","PeriodicalId":36846,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.6.1886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the number of students entering higher education increases with a growing diversity of background, educators of programming courses face increasing challenges. Different teaching pedagogies need to be explored for students with different background knowledge. Some students find programming courses difficult to understand and practice. It may lead to de-motivation and disengagement in learning process with consequential impact on their grades. Addressing these issues demands approaches for effective teaching programming courses to multidisciplinary cohorts. This article investigates how computing science (CS) and engineering cohorts respond differently to teaching approaches in a common module, Fundamentals of Programming. Both traditional teacher-centric teaching and a blended learner-centric approach have been explored in a diverse group of students. The blended learner-centric approach combines classroom teaching and self-paced blended learning using work examples videos method. These two teaching approaches have been evaluated in Academic Year 2019/2020. It can be seen from the evaluation results of 92 CS and 150 Engineering students who participate in this research that the performance is improved by about 5% through blended learner-centric approach. It is further observed that quantitatively the performance gap between CS and Engineering students has been reduced. Questionnaire survey has also been conducted with 54 CS and 89 Engineering students being responded. The learners’ perceptions of the blended learner-centric approach have also been compared between these two cohorts.
学习者在以学习者为中心的混合编程方法中的差异
随着进入高等教育的学生人数的增加和背景的日益多样化,编程课程的教育者面临着越来越大的挑战。不同背景知识的学生需要探索不同的教学方法。一些学生发现编程课程很难理解和实践。这可能会导致学习过程中缺乏动力和不投入,对他们的成绩产生相应的影响。解决这些问题需要针对多学科群体的有效的编程课程教学方法。这篇文章调查了计算机科学(CS)和工程学科的学生对编程基础这一通用模块的教学方法的不同反应。传统的以教师为中心的教学和混合的以学习者为中心的方法都在不同的学生群体中进行了探索。混合式以学习者为中心的方法结合了课堂教学和使用工作示例视频方法的自定进度混合式学习。这两种教学方法已经在2019/2020学年进行了评估。从参与本研究的92名CS学生和150名工科学生的评价结果可以看出,通过混合式学习者中心方法,成绩提高了约5%。进一步观察到,从数量上看,计算机科学与工程专业学生之间的成绩差距已经缩小。此外,我们亦进行问卷调查,共接获54名理工科学生及89名理工科学生的回复。学习者对混合式以学习者为中心的方法的看法也在这两个队列之间进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信