Analysis of the Feedback Digitization Needs in Higher Education: Experiences from Lockdown Education in the Netherlands and Germany

Q2 Social Sciences
Gayane Sedrakyan, Stéphanie M. van den Berg, B. Veldkamp, J. Hillegersberg
{"title":"Analysis of the Feedback Digitization Needs in Higher Education: Experiences from Lockdown Education in the Netherlands and Germany","authors":"Gayane Sedrakyan, Stéphanie M. van den Berg, B. Veldkamp, J. Hillegersberg","doi":"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.5.1867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After some time of lockdown experiences, limited attention for feedback and the absence of feedback digitalization frameworks suggests rethinking traditional feedback practices toward post-pandemics digital/hybrid education. This research surveyed feedback digitalization needs in the context of online education in high education institutions in the Netherlands and Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. The dimensions surveyed included preferences for feedback such as typology of feedback (e.g., cognitive, behavioral, etc.), formats (e.g., written, audio, video), online instruments, and features for communicating feedback. The results suggest that online instruments supporting features for effortless interactivity are among the highly preferred digital options for giving/receiving feedback. When given online, inclusive formats of feedback that inform learners not only about their own but also peer performance were also found to be among highly rated options. The increased need for inclusive feedback with peers, however, may also negatively affect students’ mastery orientations. Thus, balancing online with offline approaches should also be recommended when considering feedback digitalization approaches.","PeriodicalId":36846,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.5.1867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

After some time of lockdown experiences, limited attention for feedback and the absence of feedback digitalization frameworks suggests rethinking traditional feedback practices toward post-pandemics digital/hybrid education. This research surveyed feedback digitalization needs in the context of online education in high education institutions in the Netherlands and Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. The dimensions surveyed included preferences for feedback such as typology of feedback (e.g., cognitive, behavioral, etc.), formats (e.g., written, audio, video), online instruments, and features for communicating feedback. The results suggest that online instruments supporting features for effortless interactivity are among the highly preferred digital options for giving/receiving feedback. When given online, inclusive formats of feedback that inform learners not only about their own but also peer performance were also found to be among highly rated options. The increased need for inclusive feedback with peers, however, may also negatively affect students’ mastery orientations. Thus, balancing online with offline approaches should also be recommended when considering feedback digitalization approaches.
高等教育反馈数字化需求分析:荷兰和德国封锁教育的经验
在经历了一段时间的封锁之后,对反馈的关注有限,并且缺乏反馈数字化框架,这表明需要重新考虑传统的反馈做法,以适应大流行后的数字/混合教育。本研究调查了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间荷兰和德国高等教育机构在线教育的反馈数字化需求。调查的维度包括对反馈的偏好,如反馈的类型(例如,认知、行为等)、格式(例如,书面、音频、视频)、在线工具和交流反馈的功能。结果表明,支持轻松互动功能的在线工具是给予/接收反馈的高度首选数字选项之一。当在线提供反馈时,包容性的反馈格式不仅告知学习者自己的表现,而且还告知同龄人的表现,这也是高评价的选择之一。然而,对同伴的包容性反馈需求的增加也可能对学生的掌握取向产生负面影响。因此,在考虑反馈数字化方法时,也应建议平衡在线和离线方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信