Social Networks and Their Contribution in the University Educational Field: Systematic Review

Q2 Social Sciences
Omar Chamorro-Atalaya, Carlos Gamarra-Bustillos, Rufino Alejos-Ipanaque, Giorgio Aquije-Cárdenas, Yurfa Medina-Bedón, Verónica More-Sánchez, José Farfán-Aguilar, Erika Zevallos-Vera
{"title":"Social Networks and Their Contribution in the University Educational Field: Systematic Review","authors":"Omar Chamorro-Atalaya, Carlos Gamarra-Bustillos, Rufino Alejos-Ipanaque, Giorgio Aquije-Cárdenas, Yurfa Medina-Bedón, Verónica More-Sánchez, José Farfán-Aguilar, Erika Zevallos-Vera","doi":"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the massification of social networks and the incursion of data science in the university environment, it requires us to investigate and reflect on whether these tools are contributing to the improvement of the teaching-learning process, academic research, administrative services and social welfare. This paper has formulated three questions, with the purpose of conducting and achieving the goals of literature review, RQ1: What social networks are applied in the university educational field? RQ2: In what areas of the university educational system are they applied social networks? and RQ3: How do social networks contribute in their application to the university educational environment? The authors have carried out a systematic review based on the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis), on findings published in Spanish and English, in Scopus, Eric and Google Scholar databases, within the period between 2010 and 2022. The descriptors used as part of the search strategy were “Social network”, “Twitter”, “Instagram”, “WhatsApp”, “University service”, “academic services”, “administrative services” and “Social welfare services”. The results focused on the review of 17 articles, finding that the most used social network in the university environment is Twitter, focusing its application on academic services such as the teaching learning and research process. However, it is evident in the state of the art that there is a lack of institutional policies that formalise the use of social networks as well as norms that establish their good practices of use.","PeriodicalId":36846,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With the massification of social networks and the incursion of data science in the university environment, it requires us to investigate and reflect on whether these tools are contributing to the improvement of the teaching-learning process, academic research, administrative services and social welfare. This paper has formulated three questions, with the purpose of conducting and achieving the goals of literature review, RQ1: What social networks are applied in the university educational field? RQ2: In what areas of the university educational system are they applied social networks? and RQ3: How do social networks contribute in their application to the university educational environment? The authors have carried out a systematic review based on the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis), on findings published in Spanish and English, in Scopus, Eric and Google Scholar databases, within the period between 2010 and 2022. The descriptors used as part of the search strategy were “Social network”, “Twitter”, “Instagram”, “WhatsApp”, “University service”, “academic services”, “administrative services” and “Social welfare services”. The results focused on the review of 17 articles, finding that the most used social network in the university environment is Twitter, focusing its application on academic services such as the teaching learning and research process. However, it is evident in the state of the art that there is a lack of institutional policies that formalise the use of social networks as well as norms that establish their good practices of use.
社会网络及其在大学教育领域的贡献:系统回顾
随着社交网络的规模化和数据科学对大学环境的入侵,我们需要调查和反思这些工具是否有助于改善教学过程、学术研究、行政服务和社会福利。本文制定了三个问题,目的是进行和实现文献综述的目标,RQ1:哪些社会网络在大学教育领域的应用?RQ2:他们在大学教育系统的哪些领域应用了社交网络?RQ3:社交网络对大学教育环境的应用有何贡献?作者根据PRISMA声明(优选报告项目用于系统评价和荟萃分析)对2010年至2022年期间在Scopus、Eric和谷歌Scholar数据库中以西班牙语和英语发表的研究结果进行了系统评价。搜索策略中使用的描述词包括“社交网络”、“Twitter”、“Instagram”、“WhatsApp”、“大学服务”、“学术服务”、“行政服务”和“社会福利服务”。结果集中审查了17篇文章,发现在大学环境中使用最多的社交网络是Twitter,主要应用于教学学习和研究过程等学术服务。然而,很明显,就目前的技术水平而言,缺乏制度化的政策来规范社交网络的使用,也缺乏建立良好使用实践的规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信