The Development of Professional Competency Test in Knowledge and Cognitive Skill for Computer Innovation and Digital Industry

Q2 Social Sciences
Thamasan Suwanroj, Orawan Saeung, Punnee Leekitchwatana, Kanaporn Kaewkamjan
{"title":"The Development of Professional Competency Test in Knowledge and Cognitive Skill for Computer Innovation and Digital Industry","authors":"Thamasan Suwanroj, Orawan Saeung, Punnee Leekitchwatana, Kanaporn Kaewkamjan","doi":"10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to 1) analyze the content of professional competencies, 2) create the professional competency test, and 3) check the quality of the professional competency test. The operation method was composed of three steps: 1) five experts (set 1) analyzed the qualitative data of the professional competencies, 2) five experts (set 2) built the professional competency test, and 3) experts (set 3) checked the quality of the professional competency test, and then two trials of the test were performed. The research showed that 1) the content analysis of professional competencies found ten indicators: six for knowledge and four for cognitive skills, including 100 issues of the required measurement list. A test with 100 items covered the course descriptions of seventeen subjects in five curriculum groups. 2) The creation result found the professional competency test, five multiple-choice questions. The respondents got one point when they answered correctly and no point when they answered incorrectly. The test comprised 100 items in two aspects: 57 items for knowledge and 43 for cognitive skills. 3) The result of the quality check revealed that the professional competency test was good. It had a good level of content validity (IOC = 0.80-1.00). Its difficulty was appropriate (p = 0.25-0.78). The discrimination was good (r = 0.44-0.96). There was validity with a good level of internal consistency (α = 0.87), and it had good construct validity (x2- Sig = 0.25, RMSEA = 0.03, RMR = 0.02 and AGFI = 0.97), (ρc = 0.97-0.98). This test can be used as a quality tool to measure the professional competency test in knowledge and cognitive","PeriodicalId":36846,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) analyze the content of professional competencies, 2) create the professional competency test, and 3) check the quality of the professional competency test. The operation method was composed of three steps: 1) five experts (set 1) analyzed the qualitative data of the professional competencies, 2) five experts (set 2) built the professional competency test, and 3) experts (set 3) checked the quality of the professional competency test, and then two trials of the test were performed. The research showed that 1) the content analysis of professional competencies found ten indicators: six for knowledge and four for cognitive skills, including 100 issues of the required measurement list. A test with 100 items covered the course descriptions of seventeen subjects in five curriculum groups. 2) The creation result found the professional competency test, five multiple-choice questions. The respondents got one point when they answered correctly and no point when they answered incorrectly. The test comprised 100 items in two aspects: 57 items for knowledge and 43 for cognitive skills. 3) The result of the quality check revealed that the professional competency test was good. It had a good level of content validity (IOC = 0.80-1.00). Its difficulty was appropriate (p = 0.25-0.78). The discrimination was good (r = 0.44-0.96). There was validity with a good level of internal consistency (α = 0.87), and it had good construct validity (x2- Sig = 0.25, RMSEA = 0.03, RMR = 0.02 and AGFI = 0.97), (ρc = 0.97-0.98). This test can be used as a quality tool to measure the professional competency test in knowledge and cognitive
计算机创新与数字产业知识与认知技能专业能力测试的发展
本研究旨在1)分析专业胜任力的内容,2)创建专业胜任力测试,3)检验专业胜任力测试的质量。操作方法由3个步骤组成:1)5位专家(第1组)分析专业胜任力的定性数据,2)5位专家(第2组)构建专业胜任力测试,3)专家(第3组)检查专业胜任力测试的质量,然后对测试进行两次试验。研究表明:1)专业能力的内容分析发现了10个指标:6个知识指标和4个认知技能指标,包括100个所需的测量表。一个100题的测试涵盖了五个课程组的17个科目的课程描述。2)创作结果发现专业能力测试,五个选择题。答对得一分,答错得零分。该测试包括两个方面的100个项目:57个知识项目和43个认知技能项目。3)质量检查结果显示专业能力测试良好。具有较好的内容效度(IOC = 0.80-1.00)。其难度适宜(p = 0.25 ~ 0.78)。鉴别性好(r = 0.44 ~ 0.96)。效度具有较好的内部一致性(α = 0.87),具有较好的结构效度(x2- Sig = 0.25, RMSEA = 0.03, RMR = 0.02, AGFI = 0.97) (ρc = 0.97-0.98)。该测试可以作为衡量专业能力测试在知识和认知方面的质量工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信