The association of ultrafiltration with the outcomes of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in adults with cardiovascular disease: The result of a systematic review and meta-analysis

M. Al-Sadawi, Farzane Saeidifard, R. R. Ortega, P. Erwin, M. Abdallat, F. A. Hassan, A. Budzikowski
{"title":"The association of ultrafiltration with the outcomes of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in adults with cardiovascular disease: The result of a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"M. Al-Sadawi, Farzane Saeidifard, R. R. Ortega, P. Erwin, M. Abdallat, F. A. Hassan, A. Budzikowski","doi":"10.15761/JIC.1000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Previous studies have shown that ultrafiltration (UF) is associated with improved minor and major outcomes of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by improving tissue perfusion as well as lowering the patient’s hematocrit and blood loss and finally reducing the mortality. This meta-analysis aimed to pool the data of the previous studies on the association between using UF in the perioperative period and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing CPB. Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL from inception up to June 29th, 2019. The studies that assessed the association of UF with the outcomes of CPB in adults were eligible for inclusion. We did not restrict the search to time or language. Two independent investigators screened the identified studies and extracted the data in duplicate. We analyzed sixteen different clinical outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane collaboration tools. Results: Primary search identified 1114 studies from which 22 studies with 8538 patients were found eligible for inclusion. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in perioperative bleeding (-107.59 (ml) CI [-179.01, -36.18]), red blood cell transfusion (-0.76 (unit/patient) CI [-1.02,-0.51]) and ICU length of stay (-0.16 (day) CI [-0.31,-0.01]) in the group with UF compared to the control group. Aortic cross-clamp time, CPB time, ventilation time, hospital length of stay, as well as number of myocardial infarctions, chest infection, perioperative arrhythmia, low cardiac output, stroke/TIA, acute renal failure, intra-aortic balloon pump, reoperation and mortality was not statistically different between the two groups (p=>0.05). Conclusion: Using UF in adult patients undergoing CPB is associated with reduced perioperative bleeding, red blood cell transfusion, and ICU length of stay. However, the use of UF was not associated with the reduction of major cardiovascular outcomes.","PeriodicalId":91545,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/JIC.1000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies have shown that ultrafiltration (UF) is associated with improved minor and major outcomes of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by improving tissue perfusion as well as lowering the patient’s hematocrit and blood loss and finally reducing the mortality. This meta-analysis aimed to pool the data of the previous studies on the association between using UF in the perioperative period and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing CPB. Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL from inception up to June 29th, 2019. The studies that assessed the association of UF with the outcomes of CPB in adults were eligible for inclusion. We did not restrict the search to time or language. Two independent investigators screened the identified studies and extracted the data in duplicate. We analyzed sixteen different clinical outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane collaboration tools. Results: Primary search identified 1114 studies from which 22 studies with 8538 patients were found eligible for inclusion. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in perioperative bleeding (-107.59 (ml) CI [-179.01, -36.18]), red blood cell transfusion (-0.76 (unit/patient) CI [-1.02,-0.51]) and ICU length of stay (-0.16 (day) CI [-0.31,-0.01]) in the group with UF compared to the control group. Aortic cross-clamp time, CPB time, ventilation time, hospital length of stay, as well as number of myocardial infarctions, chest infection, perioperative arrhythmia, low cardiac output, stroke/TIA, acute renal failure, intra-aortic balloon pump, reoperation and mortality was not statistically different between the two groups (p=>0.05). Conclusion: Using UF in adult patients undergoing CPB is associated with reduced perioperative bleeding, red blood cell transfusion, and ICU length of stay. However, the use of UF was not associated with the reduction of major cardiovascular outcomes.
超滤与成人心血管疾病患者体外循环手术预后的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析的结果
导读:已有研究表明,超滤(UF)可改善体外循环(CPB)的组织灌注,降低患者的红细胞压积和失血量,最终降低死亡率,从而改善CPB的次要和主要结局。本荟萃分析旨在汇总以往关于成年CPB患者围手术期使用UF与临床结果之间关系的研究数据。方法:检索Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar和EBSCO CINAHL自成立至2019年6月29日的数据库。评估UF与成人CPB结果相关性的研究符合入选条件。我们没有将搜索限制在时间或语言上。两名独立调查人员对已确定的研究进行筛选,并一式两份提取数据。我们分析了16种不同的临床结果。使用Cochrane协作工具评估异质性。结果:初步检索确定了1114项研究,其中22项研究纳入8538例患者。结果显示,与对照组相比,UF组围手术期出血(-107.59 (ml) CI[-179.01, -36.18])、红细胞输血(-0.76(单位/患者)CI[-1.02,-0.51])和ICU住院时间(-0.16(天)CI[-0.31,-0.01])均有统计学意义的减少。两组患者主动脉交叉夹持时间、CPB时间、通气时间、住院时间、心肌梗死次数、胸部感染、围手术期心律失常、低心排血量、卒中/TIA、急性肾功能衰竭、主动脉内球囊泵、再手术、死亡率比较,差异均无统计学意义(p= 0.05)。结论:在成年CPB患者中使用UF可减少围手术期出血、红细胞输血和ICU住院时间。然而,UF的使用与主要心血管结局的降低无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信