Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of fear of coronavirus disease 2019 scale

Q4 Medicine
Q. Feng, C. W. Huang, Y. P. Jia, T. Liu, H. Jia, K. Wang, F. Zhang
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of fear of coronavirus disease 2019 scale","authors":"Q. Feng, C. W. Huang, Y. P. Jia, T. Liu, H. Jia, K. Wang, F. Zhang","doi":"10.16781/j.0258-879x.2021.07.0778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To translate the English version of fear of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) scale(FCV-19 S) into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. Methods FCV-19 S was translated and culture-adapted to form a Chinese version of fear of COVID-19 scale(FCV-19 S-C). A total of 334 questionnaires were sent out online, including FCV-19 S-C, Chinese version of depression, anxiety and stress scale(DASS-C21), impact of event scale-revised(IES-R) and public stigma scale. The reliability and validity of FCV-19 S-C and the influencing factors of COVID-19 fear were analyzed with the survey data. Results FCV-19 S-C contained 7 items. One common factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis, reflecting that all items in the scale belonged to the common factor, which could explain 69.5% of total variation. The load of item factors ranged from 0.780 to 0.873, showing good construct validity. The total score of FCV-19 S-C was positively correlated with the total scores of DASS-C21 and IES-R(r=0.403 and 0.471, both P<0.01), indicating that the scale had good concurrent validity. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of FCV-19 S-C was 0.924, showing good reliability. Linear regression analysis showed that the influences of COVID-19 on the psychological level and family income could predict the total score of FCV-19 S-C(β=0.62 and 0.20, both P<0.01). The total score of FCV-19 S-C could predict the total score of the public stigma scale(β=0.37, P<0.01). Conclusion FCV-19 S-C has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to understand the public fear of COVID-19 in China. The fear of COVID-19 is related to the loss of family income and the public stigma of COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":6893,"journal":{"name":"第二军医大学学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"第二军医大学学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16781/j.0258-879x.2021.07.0778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective To translate the English version of fear of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) scale(FCV-19 S) into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. Methods FCV-19 S was translated and culture-adapted to form a Chinese version of fear of COVID-19 scale(FCV-19 S-C). A total of 334 questionnaires were sent out online, including FCV-19 S-C, Chinese version of depression, anxiety and stress scale(DASS-C21), impact of event scale-revised(IES-R) and public stigma scale. The reliability and validity of FCV-19 S-C and the influencing factors of COVID-19 fear were analyzed with the survey data. Results FCV-19 S-C contained 7 items. One common factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis, reflecting that all items in the scale belonged to the common factor, which could explain 69.5% of total variation. The load of item factors ranged from 0.780 to 0.873, showing good construct validity. The total score of FCV-19 S-C was positively correlated with the total scores of DASS-C21 and IES-R(r=0.403 and 0.471, both P<0.01), indicating that the scale had good concurrent validity. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of FCV-19 S-C was 0.924, showing good reliability. Linear regression analysis showed that the influences of COVID-19 on the psychological level and family income could predict the total score of FCV-19 S-C(β=0.62 and 0.20, both P<0.01). The total score of FCV-19 S-C could predict the total score of the public stigma scale(β=0.37, P<0.01). Conclusion FCV-19 S-C has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to understand the public fear of COVID-19 in China. The fear of COVID-19 is related to the loss of family income and the public stigma of COVID-19 patients.
中国版2019冠状病毒病恐惧量表的信度和效度
目的将英文《2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)恐惧量表》(fcv - 19s)翻译成中文并评估其信度和效度。方法对fcv - 19s进行翻译和培养适应,形成中文版的COVID-19恐惧量表(fcv - 19s - c)。共在线发放问卷334份,包括FCV-19 S-C、中文版抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(das - c21)、事件影响量表(es -r)和公众污名量表。利用调查数据分析fcv - 19s - c的信度、效度及对新冠病毒恐惧的影响因素。结果fcv - 19s - c包含7个项目。探索性因子分析提取了一个共同因子,反映量表中所有条目都属于该共同因子,可以解释总变异的69.5%。项目因子负荷在0.780 ~ 0.873之间,具有较好的构念效度。FCV-19 S-C总分与das - c21、IES-R总分呈正相关(r=0.403、0.471,P均<0.01),说明该量表具有较好的并发效度。FCV-19 S-C的Cronbach 's α系数为0.924,信度较好。线性回归分析显示,新冠肺炎对心理水平和家庭收入的影响可以预测FCV-19 S-C总分(β=0.62和0.20,P均<0.01)。FCV-19 S-C总分能预测公开耻感量表总分(β=0.37, P<0.01)。结论fcv - 19s - c具有良好的信度和效度,可作为了解中国公众对新冠肺炎恐惧程度的工具。对COVID-19的恐惧与家庭收入损失和公众对COVID-19患者的污名有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
第二军医大学学报
第二军医大学学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14752
期刊介绍: Founded in 1980, Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University(AJSMMU) is sponsored by Second Military Medical University, a well-known medical university in China. AJSMMU is a peer-reviewed biomedical journal,published in Chinese with English abstracts.The journal aims to showcase outstanding research articles from all areas of biology and medicine,including basic medicine(such as biochemistry, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, etc.),clinical medicine,public health and epidemiology, military medicine,pharmacology and Traditional Chinese Medicine),to publish significant case report, and to provide both perspectives on personal experiences in medicine and reviews of the current state of biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信