Expiratory Flow Accelerator (EFA) technique on mucus hypersecretion of COPD patients with reduced cough efficiency after a severe exacerbation

E. Zampogna, E. Crisafulli, M. D'Andria, Cristina Gregorini, Giorgio Bellelli, E. Lucini, S. Faverzani, D. Visca, A. Spanevello, Nicola Schiavone, A. Chetta, A. Zanini
{"title":"Expiratory Flow Accelerator (EFA) technique on mucus hypersecretion of COPD patients with reduced cough efficiency after a severe exacerbation","authors":"E. Zampogna, E. Crisafulli, M. D'Andria, Cristina Gregorini, Giorgio Bellelli, E. Lucini, S. Faverzani, D. Visca, A. Spanevello, Nicola Schiavone, A. Chetta, A. Zanini","doi":"10.15761/icm.1000168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mucus hypersecretion has a negative impact in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Expiratory Flow Accelerator (EFA) technique removes secretions noninvasively by accelerating expiratory flow. The aim of our study was to compare EFA efficacy with the non-oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (PEP) bottle in airways clearing in COPD with hypersecretion and reduced cough efficiency after severe exacerbation. Methods: In an exploratory prospective, randomized, open-label study, we analyzed COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume at 1st second-FEV1<50%), mucus hypersecretion (sputum volume >30 ml/die) and reduced cough efficiency (peak cough expiratory flow-PCEF <300 l/min) referred to pulmonary rehabilitation after severe exacerbation. Comparison was made between group using EFA and group using PEP. Primary outcome was change in perceived bronchial encumbrance (visual analogue scale-VAS). Secondary outcomes were changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF), PCEF, lung volumes, arterial blood gases exchanges, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP), health status (COPD questionnaire score-CCQ) and impact of disease (COPD Assessment Test-CAT). Results: Twenty seven patients completed the study (14 EFA, 13 PEP). VAS, CAT, and CCQ improved in both groups (p<0.05). A greater improvement in VAS was recorded in the EFA group. Static and dynamic volumes (residual volume-RV and forced vital capacity-FVC) improve in both groups while total lung capacity (TLC) and MIP improved in the EFA group. No significant changes were recorded for arterial blood gases, PEF and PCEF. Conclusions: EFA technique can enhance airways clearing in these patients, improving lung volumes and inspiratory muscle strength. *Correspondence to: Ernesto Crisafulli, Department of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Address: P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy, Tel: 0458124263; E-mail: ecrisafulli265@gmail.com","PeriodicalId":91880,"journal":{"name":"Integrative clinical medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/icm.1000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Mucus hypersecretion has a negative impact in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Expiratory Flow Accelerator (EFA) technique removes secretions noninvasively by accelerating expiratory flow. The aim of our study was to compare EFA efficacy with the non-oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (PEP) bottle in airways clearing in COPD with hypersecretion and reduced cough efficiency after severe exacerbation. Methods: In an exploratory prospective, randomized, open-label study, we analyzed COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume at 1st second-FEV1<50%), mucus hypersecretion (sputum volume >30 ml/die) and reduced cough efficiency (peak cough expiratory flow-PCEF <300 l/min) referred to pulmonary rehabilitation after severe exacerbation. Comparison was made between group using EFA and group using PEP. Primary outcome was change in perceived bronchial encumbrance (visual analogue scale-VAS). Secondary outcomes were changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF), PCEF, lung volumes, arterial blood gases exchanges, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP), health status (COPD questionnaire score-CCQ) and impact of disease (COPD Assessment Test-CAT). Results: Twenty seven patients completed the study (14 EFA, 13 PEP). VAS, CAT, and CCQ improved in both groups (p<0.05). A greater improvement in VAS was recorded in the EFA group. Static and dynamic volumes (residual volume-RV and forced vital capacity-FVC) improve in both groups while total lung capacity (TLC) and MIP improved in the EFA group. No significant changes were recorded for arterial blood gases, PEF and PCEF. Conclusions: EFA technique can enhance airways clearing in these patients, improving lung volumes and inspiratory muscle strength. *Correspondence to: Ernesto Crisafulli, Department of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Unit, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Address: P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy, Tel: 0458124263; E-mail: ecrisafulli265@gmail.com
呼气流量加速(EFA)技术对慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重加重后咳嗽效率降低患者粘液分泌过多的治疗作用
背景:黏液分泌过多对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)有负面影响。呼气流量加速(EFA)技术通过加速呼气流量无创地去除分泌物。本研究的目的是比较EFA与非振荡呼气正压(PEP)瓶在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)严重加重后高分泌和咳嗽效率降低的气道清理中的疗效。方法:在一项探索性、前瞻性、随机、开放标签的研究中,我们分析了严重气流阻塞(第一秒用力呼气量fev130 ml/die)和咳嗽效率降低(咳嗽峰值呼气流量- pcef <300 l/min)的COPD患者在严重加重后进行肺部康复。将EFA组与PEP组进行比较。主要观察指标为感知支气管阻塞的改变(视觉模拟评分- vas)。次要结局是呼气峰流量(PEF)、PCEF、肺容量、动脉血气交换、最大吸气和呼气压(MIP和MEP)、健康状况(COPD问卷评分- ccq)和疾病影响(COPD评估测试- cat)的变化。结果:27例患者完成了研究(EFA 14例,PEP 13例)。两组患者VAS、CAT、CCQ均有改善(p<0.05)。EFA组VAS有较大改善。两组的静态和动态容积(剩余容积- rv和强制肺活量- fvc)均有改善,EFA组的总肺活量(TLC)和MIP均有改善。动脉血气、PEF和PCEF均无明显变化。结论:EFA技术可促进气道通畅,提高肺容量和吸气肌力量。*通信:Ernesto Crisafulli,维罗纳大学呼吸内科医学系和维罗纳综合大学,地址:p.l ala Scuro 10, 37134维罗纳,意大利,电话:0458124263;电子邮件:ecrisafulli265@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书