Seiches in the Plitvice Lakes

Pub Date : 2016-06-30 DOI:10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.6
M. Pasarić, L. Slaviček
{"title":"Seiches in the Plitvice Lakes","authors":"M. Pasarić, L. Slaviček","doi":"10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A campaign of high-frequency measurements of water level was carried in the two largest of the Plitvice Lakes, Prosce and Kozjak, to study seiches in the lakes. Measurements were performed at 1-min sampling rate during a 46-day interval, at two opposite ends in each lake, which also provided information on the phase relations. Power spectra were calculated to determine the periods of the normal modes. The observed peaks in the spectra were interpreted with the help of theoretical results obtained by the simple numerical method of Defant, where two different historical bathymetries were used. The lake Prosce oscillates at the periods of 8.5 min, 5.0 min, 3.3 min and 2.2 min, the oscillations being related respectively to uni-, bi-, three- and five-nodal seiche modes, whereas the four-nodal mode (2.5-2.7 min) was not significant during the experiment. The lake Kozjak oscillates at 9.0 min, 4.9 min and 2.6 min, which corresponds respectively to the uni-, bi- and four-nodal mode, the five-nodal mode is likely at the period of 1.9 min, while the three-nodal mode (~ 3.4 min) was not generated ; the deeper sub-basin displays its own principal mode at the period of 2.3 min. The discrepancy between the observed and the calculated periods is attributed to poor representation of the basin by the historical bathymetries, especially at Prosce, but also to changes in basin depth, due to continuous process of tufa growth.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A campaign of high-frequency measurements of water level was carried in the two largest of the Plitvice Lakes, Prosce and Kozjak, to study seiches in the lakes. Measurements were performed at 1-min sampling rate during a 46-day interval, at two opposite ends in each lake, which also provided information on the phase relations. Power spectra were calculated to determine the periods of the normal modes. The observed peaks in the spectra were interpreted with the help of theoretical results obtained by the simple numerical method of Defant, where two different historical bathymetries were used. The lake Prosce oscillates at the periods of 8.5 min, 5.0 min, 3.3 min and 2.2 min, the oscillations being related respectively to uni-, bi-, three- and five-nodal seiche modes, whereas the four-nodal mode (2.5-2.7 min) was not significant during the experiment. The lake Kozjak oscillates at 9.0 min, 4.9 min and 2.6 min, which corresponds respectively to the uni-, bi- and four-nodal mode, the five-nodal mode is likely at the period of 1.9 min, while the three-nodal mode (~ 3.4 min) was not generated ; the deeper sub-basin displays its own principal mode at the period of 2.3 min. The discrepancy between the observed and the calculated periods is attributed to poor representation of the basin by the historical bathymetries, especially at Prosce, but also to changes in basin depth, due to continuous process of tufa growth.
分享
查看原文
在普利特维采湖的冰山
在普利特维采两个最大的湖——普罗斯湖和科扎克湖——开展了一项高频水位测量活动,以研究湖泊中的积水。在46天的间隔时间内,在每个湖泊的两端以1分钟的采样率进行测量,这也提供了相位关系的信息。计算功率谱以确定正常模式的周期。光谱中观测到的峰是用Defant的简单数值方法得到的理论结果来解释的,其中使用了两种不同的历史测深法。湖过程振荡周期为8.5 min、5.0 min、3.3 min和2.2 min,振荡周期分别与单节点、双节点、三节点和五节点相关,而四节点(2.5 ~ 2.7 min)振荡周期不显著。Kozjak湖振荡周期为9.0 min、4.9 min和2.6 min,分别对应单节、双节和四节模态,1.9 min可能出现五节模态,未出现三节模态(~ 3.4 min);深层子盆地在2.3 min时表现出自己的主要模式。观测周期与计算周期之间的差异主要是由于历史水深测量对盆地的反映较差,特别是在过程中,但也与持续的凝灰岩生长过程引起的盆地深度变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信