Reputation Systems: A Sudy on Trust and Reputation in Brazilian Electronic Commerce

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Douglas de Lima Feitosa, Leandro S. Garcia
{"title":"Reputation Systems: A Sudy on Trust and Reputation in Brazilian Electronic Commerce","authors":"Douglas de Lima Feitosa, Leandro S. Garcia","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC20161578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reputation systems play an important role in the current electronic commerce scenario, as formulation and standardization of indices for web-stores contribute to determine customers’ buying decisions. In light of the theoretical relationship between the constructs trust and reputation, this paper intends to analyze the coherence between evaluation indexes built by reputation systems from two big business review sites. We used data from 90 Brazilian e-commerce companies (that maintain .br domains) which have achieved both reputation seals and trust seals. An ANOVA test was used in order to compare the mean of the reputation index of companies that have different trust seals. Results showed no coherence between the reputation systems and also increased the likelihood of existence of other predictive variables in this theoretical model, when it comes to assessing indices provided for those companies. This paper’s conclusions highlight the need for new studies which will allow the comprehension of particularities and variables related to reputation systems in Brazil and thus lead to a more accurate understanding of the theoretical relationship between trust and reputation.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"84-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC20161578","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC20161578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Reputation systems play an important role in the current electronic commerce scenario, as formulation and standardization of indices for web-stores contribute to determine customers’ buying decisions. In light of the theoretical relationship between the constructs trust and reputation, this paper intends to analyze the coherence between evaluation indexes built by reputation systems from two big business review sites. We used data from 90 Brazilian e-commerce companies (that maintain .br domains) which have achieved both reputation seals and trust seals. An ANOVA test was used in order to compare the mean of the reputation index of companies that have different trust seals. Results showed no coherence between the reputation systems and also increased the likelihood of existence of other predictive variables in this theoretical model, when it comes to assessing indices provided for those companies. This paper’s conclusions highlight the need for new studies which will allow the comprehension of particularities and variables related to reputation systems in Brazil and thus lead to a more accurate understanding of the theoretical relationship between trust and reputation.
信誉系统:巴西电子商务中的信任与信誉研究
信誉系统在当前的电子商务场景中扮演着重要的角色,因为网络商店指数的制定和标准化有助于确定客户的购买决策。根据构建的信任与声誉之间的理论关系,本文试图分析两大商业评论网站的声誉系统所构建的评价指标之间的一致性。我们使用了来自90家巴西电子商务公司(拥有。br域名)的数据,这些公司都获得了声誉印章和信任印章。为了比较具有不同信任印章的公司的声誉指数的平均值,采用了方差分析检验。结果显示,声誉系统之间没有一致性,也增加了理论模型中存在其他预测变量的可能性,当涉及到评估为这些公司提供的指数时。本文的结论强调了对新研究的需要,这将使人们能够理解巴西声誉系统的特殊性和变量,从而更准确地理解信任与声誉之间的理论关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信