The Influence of Power and Individualism-Collectivism on Negotiation Initiation

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
R. Volkema, I. Kapoutsis, Ana Carla Bon, José Ricardo Uchoa Cavalcanti Almeida
{"title":"The Influence of Power and Individualism-Collectivism on Negotiation Initiation","authors":"R. Volkema, I. Kapoutsis, Ana Carla Bon, José Ricardo Uchoa Cavalcanti Almeida","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negotiation is an essential business process, with the initiation of a negotiation likely to affect how the process unfolds. Despite the fact that opportunities are often lost when one or more parties fail to initiate, initiation has until recently been overlooked in negotiation process models and research. This paper reports findings from a study that examines the effects situational/contextual factors and culture have on the initiation process (engaging a prospective counterpart, making a request, and optimizing that request), focusing specifically on relative bargaining power (a situational factor) and individualism-collectivism. Higher bargaining power was found to increase the likelihood of initiation intentionality in general as well as the requesting and optimizing phases more specifically. In addition, individualism/collectivism was also found to affect initiation, with individualists more likely than collectivists to initiate a negotiation. Further, this effect was enhanced when individualists had high relative bargaining power. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, with suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"673-692"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150072","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Negotiation is an essential business process, with the initiation of a negotiation likely to affect how the process unfolds. Despite the fact that opportunities are often lost when one or more parties fail to initiate, initiation has until recently been overlooked in negotiation process models and research. This paper reports findings from a study that examines the effects situational/contextual factors and culture have on the initiation process (engaging a prospective counterpart, making a request, and optimizing that request), focusing specifically on relative bargaining power (a situational factor) and individualism-collectivism. Higher bargaining power was found to increase the likelihood of initiation intentionality in general as well as the requesting and optimizing phases more specifically. In addition, individualism/collectivism was also found to affect initiation, with individualists more likely than collectivists to initiate a negotiation. Further, this effect was enhanced when individualists had high relative bargaining power. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, with suggestions for future research.
权力与个人主义-集体主义对谈判启动的影响
谈判是一个重要的业务流程,谈判的启动可能会影响该流程的展开。尽管当一方或多方不主动时往往会失去机会,但直到最近,在谈判过程模型和研究中,主动一直被忽视。本文报告了一项研究的结果,该研究考察了情境/语境因素和文化对发起过程(吸引潜在对手、提出请求并优化该请求)的影响,特别关注相对议价能力(情境因素)和个人主义-集体主义。研究发现,较高的议价能力总体上增加了发起意向性的可能性,更具体地说,增加了请求和优化阶段的可能性。此外,个人主义/集体主义也被发现影响启动,个人主义者比集体主义者更有可能发起谈判。此外,当个人主义者具有较高的相对议价能力时,这种效应会增强。讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信