Lending Groups and Different Social Capitals in Developed and Developing Countries

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
D. Marconatto, Luciano Barin-Cruz, E. Pedrozo
{"title":"Lending Groups and Different Social Capitals in Developed and Developing Countries","authors":"D. Marconatto, Luciano Barin-Cruz, E. Pedrozo","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lending groups (LGs) and social capital are two central elements to the many microfinance solutions operating around the world. However, LG effectiveness in reducing transaction costs and lending risks for microfinance institutions (MFIs) is mediated by institutional environments. Starting from this assumption, we discuss the existent interactions between the institutional environments of developed (Anglo-Saxon and communitarian) and developing countries with different stocks of social capital (individual, network and institutional) and the influences of this interaction on LG effectiveness. In order to do so, we applied the institutional perspective of O. Williamson to build a theoretical framework to examine the interaction of all these conditions, allowing for analysis of their main relations within the microfinance context. Based on this framework, we propose on the one hand that in developing and Anglo-Saxon developed nations, stocks of both individual and network social capital are the most important for an LG's effectiveness. However, in Anglo-Saxon countries, these two stocks of social capital are complemented by formal contracting devices. In communitarian developed countries, on the other hand, the stocks of institutional social capital have a stronger positive impact on LG dynamics.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"651-672"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Lending groups (LGs) and social capital are two central elements to the many microfinance solutions operating around the world. However, LG effectiveness in reducing transaction costs and lending risks for microfinance institutions (MFIs) is mediated by institutional environments. Starting from this assumption, we discuss the existent interactions between the institutional environments of developed (Anglo-Saxon and communitarian) and developing countries with different stocks of social capital (individual, network and institutional) and the influences of this interaction on LG effectiveness. In order to do so, we applied the institutional perspective of O. Williamson to build a theoretical framework to examine the interaction of all these conditions, allowing for analysis of their main relations within the microfinance context. Based on this framework, we propose on the one hand that in developing and Anglo-Saxon developed nations, stocks of both individual and network social capital are the most important for an LG's effectiveness. However, in Anglo-Saxon countries, these two stocks of social capital are complemented by formal contracting devices. In communitarian developed countries, on the other hand, the stocks of institutional social capital have a stronger positive impact on LG dynamics.
发达国家和发展中国家的贷款集团和不同的社会资本
贷款集团(LGs)和社会资本是世界各地许多小额信贷解决方案的两个核心要素。然而,LG在降低小额信贷机构(MFIs)的交易成本和贷款风险方面的有效性受到制度环境的调节。从这一假设出发,我们讨论了发达国家(盎格鲁-撒克逊和社群主义)和拥有不同社会资本存量(个人、网络和机构)的发展中国家的制度环境之间存在的相互作用,以及这种相互作用对LG有效性的影响。为了做到这一点,我们运用O. Williamson的制度视角来构建一个理论框架来检查所有这些条件的相互作用,允许在小额信贷背景下分析它们的主要关系。基于这一框架,我们一方面提出,在发展中国家和盎格鲁-撒克逊发达国家,个人和网络社会资本存量对LG的有效性最重要。然而,在盎格鲁-撒克逊国家,这两种社会资本是由正式的契约手段补充的。另一方面,在社群主义发达国家,制度社会资本存量对LG动态有更强的正向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信