Contestações sobre o Masculino no Contexto do Trabalho: Estudo Pós-modernista em Mineradoras e Siderurgias

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Eloísio Moulin de Souza, M. Bianco, Gelson Silva Junquilho
{"title":"Contestações sobre o Masculino no Contexto do Trabalho: Estudo Pós-modernista em Mineradoras e Siderurgias","authors":"Eloísio Moulin de Souza, M. Bianco, Gelson Silva Junquilho","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC20151545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sociohistorical time called postmodernity has destroyed previously established social boundaries (Bauman, 2001). A crisis of masculinity also prevails in this context, provoking a questioning of masculinity, as well as of the predominance of older male cultural models in organizational arenas (Amaral, 2005; Brooks, 2010; Robinson, 2000). Using a cultural approach (Connell, 2004; Prasad, 2012) this article aims to analyze how the changes in masculinity have affected the male division of labor in the mining and steel sector. An important aspect is that most of the work on gender is dedicated to studying femininity as something inherent to women, while another is studying the phenomenon of masculinity in the workplace. This field research was a qualitative one that collected data through semi-structured interviews. Changes were observed to have occurred in relation to the division of labor between men and women, however, these changes occur more rapidly in private life than in the workplace. Masculinity has the function of organizing work. An inability to perform work activities related to command and conceptualization is attributed to women and effeminate homosexual and heterosexual men.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"19 1","pages":"269-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC20151545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The sociohistorical time called postmodernity has destroyed previously established social boundaries (Bauman, 2001). A crisis of masculinity also prevails in this context, provoking a questioning of masculinity, as well as of the predominance of older male cultural models in organizational arenas (Amaral, 2005; Brooks, 2010; Robinson, 2000). Using a cultural approach (Connell, 2004; Prasad, 2012) this article aims to analyze how the changes in masculinity have affected the male division of labor in the mining and steel sector. An important aspect is that most of the work on gender is dedicated to studying femininity as something inherent to women, while another is studying the phenomenon of masculinity in the workplace. This field research was a qualitative one that collected data through semi-structured interviews. Changes were observed to have occurred in relation to the division of labor between men and women, however, these changes occur more rapidly in private life than in the workplace. Masculinity has the function of organizing work. An inability to perform work activities related to command and conceptualization is attributed to women and effeminate homosexual and heterosexual men.
工作背景下的男性争议:矿业和钢铁厂的后现代主义研究
被称为后现代的社会历史时代已经摧毁了以前建立的社会界限(鲍曼,2001)。在这种背景下,男性气质的危机也普遍存在,引发了对男性气质的质疑,以及对组织领域中年长男性文化模式的主导地位的质疑(Amaral, 2005;布鲁克斯,2010;罗宾逊,2000)。使用文化方法(Connell, 2004;Prasad, 2012),本文旨在分析男性气质的变化如何影响男性在采矿和钢铁行业的分工。一个重要的方面是,大多数关于性别的工作都致力于将女性气质作为女性固有的东西来研究,而另一个是研究工作场所的男性气质现象。本实地调查是一项定性研究,通过半结构化访谈收集数据。据观察,在男女之间的劳动分工方面发生了变化,然而,这些变化在私人生活中比在工作场所发生得更快。男子气概具有组织工作的功能。无法执行与指挥和概念化相关的工作活动归因于女性和娘娘腔的同性恋和异性恋男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信