Risk Factors for Working in Confined Spaces: Contributions for Psychosocial Assessment

Q3 Social Sciences
Paideia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-4327e3212
M. Mombelli, R. A. Reis, A. Zilly, M. Marziale, Werner Olinto Amorim Braga, C. B. Santos
{"title":"Risk Factors for Working in Confined Spaces: Contributions for Psychosocial Assessment","authors":"M. Mombelli, R. A. Reis, A. Zilly, M. Marziale, Werner Olinto Amorim Braga, C. B. Santos","doi":"10.1590/1982-4327e3212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The recommendation of standards for companies supports the safety of workers. This study aimed to describe the psychosocial risk factors perceived by personnel that work in confined spaces. Qualitative study, conducted via interviews with 50 employees. Data were processed using the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires software, with a descending hierarchical classification. The psychosocial risk management model identified five risk dimensions and described the interface between the categories of work context and content: interpersonal relationships (29.58%), task planning (23.50%), role in the organization (17.83%), home-work interface (15.10%), and workload and work pace (13.97%). The risk factors identified from the workers’’ perspective allow reviewing psychosocial assessment, management practices, and the advancement of scientific knowledge, essential to rethink current legislation and mental health care for professionals that work in confined spaces.","PeriodicalId":38841,"journal":{"name":"Paideia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The recommendation of standards for companies supports the safety of workers. This study aimed to describe the psychosocial risk factors perceived by personnel that work in confined spaces. Qualitative study, conducted via interviews with 50 employees. Data were processed using the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires software, with a descending hierarchical classification. The psychosocial risk management model identified five risk dimensions and described the interface between the categories of work context and content: interpersonal relationships (29.58%), task planning (23.50%), role in the organization (17.83%), home-work interface (15.10%), and workload and work pace (13.97%). The risk factors identified from the workers’’ perspective allow reviewing psychosocial assessment, management practices, and the advancement of scientific knowledge, essential to rethink current legislation and mental health care for professionals that work in confined spaces.
在密闭空间工作的危险因素:对社会心理评估的贡献
公司推荐的标准支持工人的安全。本研究旨在描述在密闭空间工作的人员所感知到的社会心理风险因素。定性研究,通过采访50名员工进行。数据处理采用界面分析、多维文本和问卷调查软件,采用降序分层分类。心理社会风险管理模型确定了五个风险维度,并描述了工作环境和内容类别之间的接口:人际关系(29.58%)、任务规划(23.50%)、组织角色(17.83%)、家庭-工作接口(15.10%)、工作量和工作速度(13.97%)。从工人角度确定的风险因素有助于审查心理社会评估、管理做法和科学知识的进步,这对于重新考虑目前的立法和在密闭空间工作的专业人员的精神保健至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paideia
Paideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信