Incremental Validity between the Wartegg and Rorschach tests (R-PAS)

Q3 Social Sciences
Paideia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-4327E3106
Fernando Pessotto, Ricardo Primi
{"title":"Incremental Validity between the Wartegg and Rorschach tests (R-PAS)","authors":"Fernando Pessotto, Ricardo Primi","doi":"10.1590/1982-4327E3106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Incremental validity indicates how much a measure can add prevision to a criterion, more than what can be previewed by other sources of data. In other words, it means how an instrument can complement and aid on information comprehension derived from another. The objective of the study was to verify evidence of incremental validity between the Wartegg and the Rorschach tests (R-PAS). A total of 40 subjects with ages varying between 21 to 70 years participated, divided into two groups, one composed by schizophrenia diagnosis and another, by subjects with a history of psychiatric diseases. Everybody responded to the Rorschach and Wartegg tests. The results indicated predictive capacity among the instruments of 75% for the variable Formal Quality, 98% for Movement and 100% for Content. New studies are suggested about validity evidences with larger samples as well as the analysis of other variables, not explored in this study.","PeriodicalId":38841,"journal":{"name":"Paideia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327E3106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Incremental validity indicates how much a measure can add prevision to a criterion, more than what can be previewed by other sources of data. In other words, it means how an instrument can complement and aid on information comprehension derived from another. The objective of the study was to verify evidence of incremental validity between the Wartegg and the Rorschach tests (R-PAS). A total of 40 subjects with ages varying between 21 to 70 years participated, divided into two groups, one composed by schizophrenia diagnosis and another, by subjects with a history of psychiatric diseases. Everybody responded to the Rorschach and Wartegg tests. The results indicated predictive capacity among the instruments of 75% for the variable Formal Quality, 98% for Movement and 100% for Content. New studies are suggested about validity evidences with larger samples as well as the analysis of other variables, not explored in this study.
华特格测验与罗夏测验的增量效度
增量有效性指的是一个度量可以为标准增加多少预见性,而不是其他数据源可以预见性。换句话说,它意味着一种工具如何补充和帮助来自另一种工具的信息理解。本研究的目的是验证华特格测验和罗夏测验(R-PAS)之间递增效度的证据。共有40名年龄在21岁至70岁之间的受试者参加,分为两组,一组由精神分裂症诊断组成,另一组由有精神病史的受试者组成。每个人都对罗夏和华特格测试有反应。结果表明,对变量形式质量的预测能力为75%,对运动的预测能力为98%,对内容的预测能力为100%。在本研究中未涉及的更大样本的效度证据以及其他变量的分析方面提出了新的研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paideia
Paideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信