Facing the Pandemic in Brazil: controversies surrounding “early treatment” and vaccination

Gabriela Dias Blanco, Eleandra Raquel da Silva Koch, C. Prates
{"title":"Facing the Pandemic in Brazil: controversies surrounding “early treatment” and vaccination","authors":"Gabriela Dias Blanco, Eleandra Raquel da Silva Koch, C. Prates","doi":"10.1590/1809-43412022v19e903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article investigates the controversies that emerge with the production of the CoronaVac vaccine, the first Covid-19 vaccine available in Brazil, on June 11th, 2020. Based on Actor-Network Theory, this study is inspired by virtual ethnography. We thus privilege digital documents from government agencies and medical entities, specialized publications, publications in Facebook groups, and the writing of a virtual field diary. Our investigation ends with the approval of the CoronaVac and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). We identify the construction of factoids by groups that were critical of social distancing measures, basing themselves on the use of purportedly scientific arguments. The alliances established between doctors and the federal government through the Ministry of Health challenged the vaccine as a technoscientific artifact, and advocated for drugs that were part of the so-called \"early treatment\" as the \"cure\" for the pandemic in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":37082,"journal":{"name":"Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412022v19e903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The article investigates the controversies that emerge with the production of the CoronaVac vaccine, the first Covid-19 vaccine available in Brazil, on June 11th, 2020. Based on Actor-Network Theory, this study is inspired by virtual ethnography. We thus privilege digital documents from government agencies and medical entities, specialized publications, publications in Facebook groups, and the writing of a virtual field diary. Our investigation ends with the approval of the CoronaVac and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). We identify the construction of factoids by groups that were critical of social distancing measures, basing themselves on the use of purportedly scientific arguments. The alliances established between doctors and the federal government through the Ministry of Health challenged the vaccine as a technoscientific artifact, and advocated for drugs that were part of the so-called "early treatment" as the "cure" for the pandemic in Brazil.
巴西面临大流行:围绕“早期治疗”和疫苗接种的争议
摘要本文调查了2020年6月11日巴西首个新冠肺炎疫苗CoronaVac疫苗生产过程中出现的争议。本研究以行动者网络理论为基础,受到虚拟民族志的启发。因此,我们对来自政府机构和医疗实体、专业出版物、Facebook群组中的出版物以及虚拟现场日记的书写的数字文件给予特权。我们的调查以国家卫生监督局(Anvisa)批准CoronaVac和Oxford/AstraZeneca疫苗结束。我们确定了对社会距离措施持批评态度的群体构建的事实,这些群体基于所谓的科学论据的使用。医生和联邦政府通过卫生部建立的联盟质疑疫苗是一种技术科学产物,并主张将所谓“早期治疗”的一部分药物作为巴西大流行的“治愈方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology
Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信