How ideas became knowledge: The light-quantum hypothesis 1905––1935

S. Brush
{"title":"How ideas became knowledge: The light-quantum hypothesis 1905––1935","authors":"S. Brush","doi":"10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1905, Albert Einstein proposed as a “heuristic viewpoint” that light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation behave in some respects like streams of particles, each carrying energy hn (h = Planck’s constant, n = frequency), even though they also behave like waves. This became known as the Light Quantum Hypothesis. J. J. Thomson and other physicists proposed similar but less quantitative ideas. When and why did physicists accept the LQH? It is shown that a significant number of physicists already accepted particulate aspects of radiation before the discovery of the Compton effect in 1923, and that research on the photoelectric effect played an important role in this acceptance. Compton argued that his research was stronger evidence for the LQH because it yielded a prediction about a previously unknown phenomenon, the recoil electron. But there is little evidence that other scientists gave extra credit for predicting a result before rather than after it was known. Probably the combination of both effects (and other evidence) was needed to persuade skeptics.","PeriodicalId":81438,"journal":{"name":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","volume":"37 1","pages":"205-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.205","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2007.37.2.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In 1905, Albert Einstein proposed as a “heuristic viewpoint” that light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation behave in some respects like streams of particles, each carrying energy hn (h = Planck’s constant, n = frequency), even though they also behave like waves. This became known as the Light Quantum Hypothesis. J. J. Thomson and other physicists proposed similar but less quantitative ideas. When and why did physicists accept the LQH? It is shown that a significant number of physicists already accepted particulate aspects of radiation before the discovery of the Compton effect in 1923, and that research on the photoelectric effect played an important role in this acceptance. Compton argued that his research was stronger evidence for the LQH because it yielded a prediction about a previously unknown phenomenon, the recoil electron. But there is little evidence that other scientists gave extra credit for predicting a result before rather than after it was known. Probably the combination of both effects (and other evidence) was needed to persuade skeptics.
思想如何成为知识:光量子假说1905—1935
1905年,阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦提出了一个“启发式观点”,即光和其他形式的电磁辐射在某些方面表现得像粒子流,每个都携带能量hn (h =普朗克常数,n =频率),尽管它们也表现得像波。这就是著名的光量子假说。j.j.汤姆森(j.j. Thomson)和其他物理学家也提出了类似的想法,但数量较少。物理学家是什么时候以及为什么接受LQH的?结果表明,在1923年康普顿效应发现之前,相当多的物理学家已经接受了辐射的微粒方面,而光电效应的研究在这种接受中起了重要作用。康普顿认为,他的研究为LQH提供了更有力的证据,因为它预测了一种以前未知的现象,即反冲电子。但几乎没有证据表明,其他科学家在预测结果之前而不是之后给予了额外的信任。也许需要这两种效应(以及其他证据)的结合来说服怀疑论者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信