After the famine: Plant pathology, Phytophthora infestans, and the late blight of potatoes, 1845––1960

R. Turner
{"title":"After the famine: Plant pathology, Phytophthora infestans, and the late blight of potatoes, 1845––1960","authors":"R. Turner","doi":"10.1525/HSPS.2005.35.2.341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The late blight disease of potatoes, which triggered the great Irish famine of 1845-1849, remains one of the most feared and intractable plant diseases today. Decades of dispute about the cause of the disease followed the outbreak of 1845, and the scientifi c controversy illustrates the uneasy historical relationship among farmers, scientifi c agronomists, and plant pathologists. Consensus fi nally emerged that the fungus Phytophthora infestans was the true cause of the disease, but that organism9s full life cycle remained obscure. Its sexual oospores could not be readily obtained by mycologists, despite sporadic reports that had been observed. The 20th century opened with great optimism that resistant varieties could be developed using dominant R-genes obtainable from some wild species, and this optimism led to a proliferation of public breeding programs between 1925 and 1935. But these hopes had foundered by the early 1950s with the inexplicable appearance of new fungal races that could overwhelm the most blight-resistant germplasm. The Rockefeller Foundation9s postwar agricultural initiative in Mexico led during the 1950s to dramatic and unexpected solutions to some of the late blight puzzles. But even then the fungus remained obscure, and effective, non-chemical control methods have never been forthcoming. This article examines the historical frustrations of late-blight science and advances that history as a case study illustrating the rise and fall of an ““heroic age”” of resistance breeding and plant pathology in the first half of the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":81438,"journal":{"name":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","volume":"35 1","pages":"341-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/HSPS.2005.35.2.341","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences : HSPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/HSPS.2005.35.2.341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The late blight disease of potatoes, which triggered the great Irish famine of 1845-1849, remains one of the most feared and intractable plant diseases today. Decades of dispute about the cause of the disease followed the outbreak of 1845, and the scientifi c controversy illustrates the uneasy historical relationship among farmers, scientifi c agronomists, and plant pathologists. Consensus fi nally emerged that the fungus Phytophthora infestans was the true cause of the disease, but that organism9s full life cycle remained obscure. Its sexual oospores could not be readily obtained by mycologists, despite sporadic reports that had been observed. The 20th century opened with great optimism that resistant varieties could be developed using dominant R-genes obtainable from some wild species, and this optimism led to a proliferation of public breeding programs between 1925 and 1935. But these hopes had foundered by the early 1950s with the inexplicable appearance of new fungal races that could overwhelm the most blight-resistant germplasm. The Rockefeller Foundation9s postwar agricultural initiative in Mexico led during the 1950s to dramatic and unexpected solutions to some of the late blight puzzles. But even then the fungus remained obscure, and effective, non-chemical control methods have never been forthcoming. This article examines the historical frustrations of late-blight science and advances that history as a case study illustrating the rise and fall of an ““heroic age”” of resistance breeding and plant pathology in the first half of the 20th century.
饥荒后:植物病理学,疫霉,马铃薯晚疫病,1845 - 1960
摘要:马铃薯晚疫病曾引发1845年至1849年的爱尔兰大饥荒,至今仍是最可怕和最棘手的植物病害之一。1845年爆发后,关于该病起因的争论持续了几十年,而科学上的争论说明了农民、科学农学家和植物病理学家之间不稳定的历史关系。人们最终达成共识,认为真菌疫霉(Phytophthora infestans)是该疾病的真正病因,但该有机体的完整生命周期仍不清楚。真菌学家很难获得它的性卵孢子,尽管有零星的报道。20世纪初,人们非常乐观地认为,利用从一些野生物种中获得的显性r基因,可以培育出具有抗性的品种,这种乐观导致了1925年至1935年间公共育种计划的激增。但是,这些希望在20世纪50年代初破灭了,因为令人费解的新真菌品种出现了,它们可以压倒最抗枯萎病的种质。20世纪50年代,洛克菲勒基金会在墨西哥发起的战后农业倡议,为一些晚期枯萎病的难题带来了戏剧性的、意想不到的解决方案。但即便如此,这种真菌仍然鲜为人知,而且有效的非化学控制方法从未出现过。本文考察了晚疫病科学的历史挫折,并将这段历史作为一个案例研究,说明了20世纪上半叶抗病育种和植物病理学的“英雄时代”的兴衰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信