COMPARING BUDGETARY STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES The cases of Paris and São Paulo

Q3 Social Sciences
Ursula Dias Peres, C. Alle
{"title":"COMPARING BUDGETARY STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES The cases of Paris and São Paulo","authors":"Ursula Dias Peres, C. Alle","doi":"10.1590/3610701/2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article compares the structure of the city budget of São Paulo and Paris and their processes between 2008 and 2018, aiding in the understanding of budgetary decisions and contributing to the literature on public budgets, more focused on national and federal levels. As the budget process is very technical and standardized, one should observe several similarities between both cases This article demonstrates how similar the budget structures and processes of these two metropolises are. It indicates, for example, that both present incrementalisms in their budget base, as expected according to theory. However, the study also indicates differences within similarities as both cases, with very different macro institutions (federal versus unitary States), similar meso-institutions (organization of municipal institutions, municipal public policies), but certain different rules, generate important differences in their processes and some divergence in their results.","PeriodicalId":35414,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/3610701/2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article compares the structure of the city budget of São Paulo and Paris and their processes between 2008 and 2018, aiding in the understanding of budgetary decisions and contributing to the literature on public budgets, more focused on national and federal levels. As the budget process is very technical and standardized, one should observe several similarities between both cases This article demonstrates how similar the budget structures and processes of these two metropolises are. It indicates, for example, that both present incrementalisms in their budget base, as expected according to theory. However, the study also indicates differences within similarities as both cases, with very different macro institutions (federal versus unitary States), similar meso-institutions (organization of municipal institutions, municipal public policies), but certain different rules, generate important differences in their processes and some divergence in their results.
比较预算结构和流程巴黎和圣保罗的案例
本文比较了2008年至2018年间圣保罗和巴黎的城市预算结构及其流程,有助于理解预算决策,并为公共预算文献做出贡献,这些文献更侧重于国家和联邦层面。由于预算流程非常技术性和标准化,人们应该注意到这两个案例之间的一些相似之处。本文展示了这两个大都市的预算结构和流程是多么相似。例如,它表明,正如理论所预期的那样,两者的预算基础都呈现增量主义。然而,该研究也指出了相似之处的不同,因为这两种情况都有非常不同的宏观制度(联邦与单一制国家),类似的中观制度(市政机构的组织,市政公共政策),但某些不同的规则,在其过程中产生重要差异,在其结果中产生一些分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais
Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Editada por primeira vez em 1986, nove anos depois da fundação da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais (Anpocs), a Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (RBCS) consolidou-se ou longo dos anos como um dos periódicos mais importantes de veiculação da produção científica de ponta nas três grandes áreas das ciências sociais (antropologia, sociologia e ciência política). É um periódico multidisciplinar no campo das ciências humanas que segue uma definição estrita de multidisciplinaridade, privilegiando contribuições substantivas em seu campo. Ocasionalmente, acolhe artigos oriundos de outras áreas, quando claramente dedicados a travar interlocução com a produção de conhecimento nas ciências sociais. Publicada ininterruptamente durante todos esses anos, nasceu e desenvolveu seu perfil editorial ao longo do tempo como periódico da Anpocs. A partir do número 90, publicado em fevereiro de 2016, passou a circular apenas em formato digital. Os artigos da revista se encontram disponíveis, em acesso aberto, tanto no SciELO quanto na página institucional da Anpocs, no canal Publicações, bem como em algumas redes acadêmicas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信