Factors associated with neonatal near miss in a Midwest capital in Brazil

Q3 Medicine
Priscilla Shirley Siniak dos Anjos Modes, M. A. Gaíva, A. C. D. S. Andrade, L. V. Guimarães
{"title":"Factors associated with neonatal near miss in a Midwest capital in Brazil","authors":"Priscilla Shirley Siniak dos Anjos Modes, M. A. Gaíva, A. C. D. S. Andrade, L. V. Guimarães","doi":"10.1590/1806-9304202300000244-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: to estimate neonatal near miss rates and investigate sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate factors residing in a Midwest capital city. Methods: observational cohort study of live births from Cuiabá in the period of 2015 to 2018, with data from the Sistemas de Informações sobre Mortalidade e sobre Nascidos Vivos (Mortality and Live Birth Information Systems). The neonatal near miss rate was calculated according to sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate variables. Logistic regression model was adjusted to analyze the factors associated with neonatal near miss. Results: the neonatal near miss rate was 22.8 per thousand live births and the variables showed an association with the outcome were: maternal age 35 years or older (OR=1.53; CI95%=1.17-2.00), having fewer than six prenatal consultations (OR=2.43; CI95%=2.08-2.86), non-cephalic fetal presentation (OR=3.09; CI95%=2.44-3.92), multiple pregnancy (OR=3.30; CI95%=2.57- 4.23), no live birth (OR=1.62; CI95%=1.34-1.96) or one live birth (OR=1.22; CI95%=1.00-1.48), delivery in public/university hospital (OR=2.16; CI95%=1.73-2.71) and philanthropic hospital (OR=1.51; CI95%=1.19-1.91) and non-induced labor (OR=1.50; CI95%=1.25-1.80). Conclusion: the neonatal near miss rate was 3.04 cases for each death, and neonatal near miss was influenced by maternal characteristics, obstetric history, type of birth hospital, and delivery care organization.","PeriodicalId":35416,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9304202300000244-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: to estimate neonatal near miss rates and investigate sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate factors residing in a Midwest capital city. Methods: observational cohort study of live births from Cuiabá in the period of 2015 to 2018, with data from the Sistemas de Informações sobre Mortalidade e sobre Nascidos Vivos (Mortality and Live Birth Information Systems). The neonatal near miss rate was calculated according to sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate variables. Logistic regression model was adjusted to analyze the factors associated with neonatal near miss. Results: the neonatal near miss rate was 22.8 per thousand live births and the variables showed an association with the outcome were: maternal age 35 years or older (OR=1.53; CI95%=1.17-2.00), having fewer than six prenatal consultations (OR=2.43; CI95%=2.08-2.86), non-cephalic fetal presentation (OR=3.09; CI95%=2.44-3.92), multiple pregnancy (OR=3.30; CI95%=2.57- 4.23), no live birth (OR=1.62; CI95%=1.34-1.96) or one live birth (OR=1.22; CI95%=1.00-1.48), delivery in public/university hospital (OR=2.16; CI95%=1.73-2.71) and philanthropic hospital (OR=1.51; CI95%=1.19-1.91) and non-induced labor (OR=1.50; CI95%=1.25-1.80). Conclusion: the neonatal near miss rate was 3.04 cases for each death, and neonatal near miss was influenced by maternal characteristics, obstetric history, type of birth hospital, and delivery care organization.
在巴西中西部的一个首都,新生儿差点漏诊的相关因素
摘要:目的:估计新生儿近漏率,调查居住在中西部首府城市的社会人口统计学、产科、分娩和新生儿因素。方法:对2015年至2018年库亚ab地区的活产婴儿进行观察性队列研究,数据来自Informações死亡率和活产信息系统(死亡率和活产信息系统)。根据社会人口学、产科、分娩和新生儿变量计算新生儿近漏诊率。结果:新生儿近漏率为22.8 /千活产,与结局相关的变量为:母亲年龄35岁及以上(or =1.53;CI95%=1.17-2.00),产前咨询少于6次(OR=2.43;CI95%=2.08-2.86),非头位胎儿呈现(OR=3.09;CI95%=2.44-3.92)、多胎妊娠(OR=3.30;CI95%=2.57- 4.23),无活产(OR=1.62;CI95%=1.34-1.96)或1例活产(or =1.22;CI95%=1.00-1.48),在公立/大学医院分娩(OR=2.16;CI95%=1.73 ~ 2.71)和慈善医院(OR=1.51;CI95%=1.19-1.91)和非引产(OR=1.50;CI95% = 1.25 - -1.80)。结论:新生儿近漏产率为3.04例/例,新生儿近漏产受产妇特征、产科史、分娩医院类型、分娩护理机构等因素影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil
Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Mother and Child Health is published every three months (March, June, September and December) by Institute of Mother and Child Health, continuing the Revista do IMIP. Aiming at publishing scientific research articles in the field of mother and child health. Contributions should approach different aspects of mother’s health, women’s health and children’s health, covering biomedical, sociocultural and epidemiological determinants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信