Transition Temperature for Spin-Crossover Materials with the Mean Value Ensemble Hubbard-U Correction

IF 2.7 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Angel Albavera-Mata, Richard G. Hennig* and S. B. Trickey*, 
{"title":"Transition Temperature for Spin-Crossover Materials with the Mean Value Ensemble Hubbard-U Correction","authors":"Angel Albavera-Mata,&nbsp;Richard G. Hennig* and S. B. Trickey*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Calculation of transition temperatures <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> for thermally driven spin-crossover in condensed phases is challenging, even with sophisticated state-of-the-art density functional approximations. The first issue is the accuracy of the adiabatic crossover energy difference <i>ΔE</i><sub>HL</sub> between the low- and high-spin states of the bistable metal–organic complexes. The other is the proper inclusion of entropic contributions to the Gibbs free energy from the electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom. We discuss the effects of treatments of both contributions upon the calculation of thermochemical properties for a set of 20 spin-crossover materials using a Hubbard-<i>U</i> correction obtained from a reference ensemble spin-state. The <i>U</i> values obtained from a simplest bimolecular representation may overcorrect, somewhat, the <i>ΔE</i><sub>HL</sub> values, hence giving somewhat excessive reduction of the <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> results with respect to their <i>U</i> = 0 values in the crystalline phase. We discuss the origins of the discrepancies by analyzing different sources of uncertainties. By use of a first-coordination-sphere approximation and the assumption that vibrational contributions from the outermost atoms in a metal–organic complex are similar in both low- and high-spin states, we achieve <i>T</i><sub>1/2</sub> results with the low-cost, widely used PBE generalized gradient density functional approximation comparable to those from the more costly, more sophisticated r<sup>2</sup>SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. The procedure is promising for use in high-throughput materials screening, because it combines rather low computational effort requirements with freedom from user manipulation of parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"127 36","pages":"7646–7654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c03520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculation of transition temperatures T1/2 for thermally driven spin-crossover in condensed phases is challenging, even with sophisticated state-of-the-art density functional approximations. The first issue is the accuracy of the adiabatic crossover energy difference ΔEHL between the low- and high-spin states of the bistable metal–organic complexes. The other is the proper inclusion of entropic contributions to the Gibbs free energy from the electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom. We discuss the effects of treatments of both contributions upon the calculation of thermochemical properties for a set of 20 spin-crossover materials using a Hubbard-U correction obtained from a reference ensemble spin-state. The U values obtained from a simplest bimolecular representation may overcorrect, somewhat, the ΔEHL values, hence giving somewhat excessive reduction of the T1/2 results with respect to their U = 0 values in the crystalline phase. We discuss the origins of the discrepancies by analyzing different sources of uncertainties. By use of a first-coordination-sphere approximation and the assumption that vibrational contributions from the outermost atoms in a metal–organic complex are similar in both low- and high-spin states, we achieve T1/2 results with the low-cost, widely used PBE generalized gradient density functional approximation comparable to those from the more costly, more sophisticated r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. The procedure is promising for use in high-throughput materials screening, because it combines rather low computational effort requirements with freedom from user manipulation of parameters.

Abstract Image

自旋交叉材料的转变温度与平均值系综hubard - u校正
计算凝聚相中热驱动自旋交叉的转变温度T1/2是具有挑战性的,即使使用最先进的密度泛函近似。第一个问题是双稳定金属-有机配合物的低自旋态和高自旋态之间绝热交叉能量差ΔEHL的准确性。另一个是适当地包含了电子自由度和振动自由度对吉布斯自由能的熵贡献。我们讨论了处理这两种贡献对一组20个自旋交叉材料的热化学性质计算的影响,这些材料使用从参考系综自旋态得到的Hubbard-U校正。从最简单的双分子表示中得到的U值可能在某种程度上矫枉过正ΔEHL值,因此,相对于结晶相中的U = 0值,T1/2结果有些过度降低。我们通过分析不同的不确定性来源来讨论差异的起源。利用第一配位球近似,并假设金属-有机配合物中最外层原子的振动贡献在低自旋态和高自旋态都相似,我们用低成本、广泛使用的PBE广义梯度密度泛函近似获得了T1/2的结果,与更昂贵、更复杂的r2SCAN元广义梯度近似相当。该程序有望用于高通量材料筛选,因为它结合了相当低的计算工作量要求和用户操纵参数的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信