University Students’ Level of Boredom and their Coping Strategies in Emergency Remote Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Serap Önen, Mehdi Solhi
{"title":"University Students’ Level of Boredom and their Coping Strategies in Emergency Remote Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic","authors":"Serap Önen, Mehdi Solhi","doi":"10.1504/ijil.2023.10045809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was twofold: firstly, we investigated whether there is a difference between male and female university students' level of boredom and their boredom coping strategies (i.e., cognitive approach, behavioural approach, cognitive avoidance, and behavioural avoidance) in emergency online lessons during the COVID-19 pandemic, and secondly an attempt was made to examine whether the participants' academic level (i.e., freshman, sophomore, junior and senior) affects their boredom experiences and boredom coping strategies. A total of 201 undergraduate students from a Turkish state university participated in the study. Results indicated that the male university students experience higher levels of boredom than their counterparts. In addition, the female participants exhibited stronger inclination towards using both cognitive approach and cognitive avoidance than the males to strategically cope with boredom. Besides, the participants with different academic levels did not score differently in their level of boredom and they indicated a significant difference only in their behavioural avoidance in coping with boredom. Indeed, as the academic level of the participants increases, they exhibit a greater tendency to use behavioural avoidance to relieve boredom.","PeriodicalId":44904,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2023.10045809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: firstly, we investigated whether there is a difference between male and female university students' level of boredom and their boredom coping strategies (i.e., cognitive approach, behavioural approach, cognitive avoidance, and behavioural avoidance) in emergency online lessons during the COVID-19 pandemic, and secondly an attempt was made to examine whether the participants' academic level (i.e., freshman, sophomore, junior and senior) affects their boredom experiences and boredom coping strategies. A total of 201 undergraduate students from a Turkish state university participated in the study. Results indicated that the male university students experience higher levels of boredom than their counterparts. In addition, the female participants exhibited stronger inclination towards using both cognitive approach and cognitive avoidance than the males to strategically cope with boredom. Besides, the participants with different academic levels did not score differently in their level of boredom and they indicated a significant difference only in their behavioural avoidance in coping with boredom. Indeed, as the academic level of the participants increases, they exhibit a greater tendency to use behavioural avoidance to relieve boredom.
冠状病毒大流行期间大学生应急远程教育无聊程度及应对策略
这项研究的目的有两个:首先,我们调查了在新冠肺炎大流行期间,男女大学生在应急网络课程中的无聊水平和无聊应对策略(认知方法、行为方法、认知回避和行为回避)是否存在差异;其次,我们试图检验参与者的学术水平(大一、大二、低年级和高年级学生)会影响他们的无聊经历和无聊应对策略。来自土耳其一所州立大学的201名本科生参与了本研究。结果表明,男大学生比其他大学生更容易感到无聊。此外,女性受试者表现出比男性更强的倾向于使用认知方法和认知回避来策略性地应对无聊。此外,不同学术水平的参与者在无聊程度上的得分没有差异,只有在应对无聊的行为回避方面存在显著差异。事实上,随着参与者学术水平的提高,他们更倾向于使用行为回避来缓解无聊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
37.50%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The IJIL, a fully refereed journal, is an authoritative source presenting information on the current practice, content, technology, and services in the area of innovation and learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信