Surviving the Secular: Faith, Grief, Parody

Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1353/stu.2022.0030
M. Kirwan
{"title":"Surviving the Secular: Faith, Grief, Parody","authors":"M. Kirwan","doi":"10.1353/stu.2022.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Diary of a Country Priest, George Bernanos offers an unsettling image: [T]he Church is not only ... a kind of sovereign state with laws, officials, armies – a moment, as glorious as you please, in human history. The Church is on the march through time as a regiment marches through strange country, cut off from all its ordinary supplies. The Church lives on successive regimes and societies, as the soldiers would from day to day on the inhabitants.1 I am aware the metaphor of military occupation is problematic, given the present state of war in Europe, but I am intrigued by its audacious and honest assertion, that there is something parasitic about the Church’s relation to the space it is occupying (if only temporarily). How do we imagine the Church’s survival into a post-Christendom future? Is it possible, as Bernanos suggests, that the contemporary Church, apparently burnt out and running on empty, can nevertheless draw sustenance from its environment – no matter how indifferent or hostile the local population? While not losing sight of Bernanos’s fugitive regiment, I will suggest in the conclusion that the musical term ‘parody’ might better describe the relation of dependency that he has in mind. Regarding the Church’s postChristendom survival, there are other indications that the future may be different from what is generally predicted. Crawford Gribben concludes The Rise and Fall of Christian Ireland with some striking assertions: What passed as Christian Ireland is finally over – and Christians should be glad ... What has passed as Christian Ireland is dead. But its critics cannot relax any more than believers ought to despair.2 Gribben’s book narrates the ‘rise and fall’ of Irish Christianity, as we commemorate the historical markers of Ireland’s ascendency, its ‘coming of age’ as a modern secular state (independence in 1922, constitutional amendment to remove the ‘special position’ of the Catholic Church in 1972). The see-saw picture would appear to be a vindication of the standard ‘subtraction’ model of secularisation: ‘the common notion that the secular is Michael Kirwan","PeriodicalId":82834,"journal":{"name":"Studies","volume":"111 1","pages":"239 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/stu.2022.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In The Diary of a Country Priest, George Bernanos offers an unsettling image: [T]he Church is not only ... a kind of sovereign state with laws, officials, armies – a moment, as glorious as you please, in human history. The Church is on the march through time as a regiment marches through strange country, cut off from all its ordinary supplies. The Church lives on successive regimes and societies, as the soldiers would from day to day on the inhabitants.1 I am aware the metaphor of military occupation is problematic, given the present state of war in Europe, but I am intrigued by its audacious and honest assertion, that there is something parasitic about the Church’s relation to the space it is occupying (if only temporarily). How do we imagine the Church’s survival into a post-Christendom future? Is it possible, as Bernanos suggests, that the contemporary Church, apparently burnt out and running on empty, can nevertheless draw sustenance from its environment – no matter how indifferent or hostile the local population? While not losing sight of Bernanos’s fugitive regiment, I will suggest in the conclusion that the musical term ‘parody’ might better describe the relation of dependency that he has in mind. Regarding the Church’s postChristendom survival, there are other indications that the future may be different from what is generally predicted. Crawford Gribben concludes The Rise and Fall of Christian Ireland with some striking assertions: What passed as Christian Ireland is finally over – and Christians should be glad ... What has passed as Christian Ireland is dead. But its critics cannot relax any more than believers ought to despair.2 Gribben’s book narrates the ‘rise and fall’ of Irish Christianity, as we commemorate the historical markers of Ireland’s ascendency, its ‘coming of age’ as a modern secular state (independence in 1922, constitutional amendment to remove the ‘special position’ of the Catholic Church in 1972). The see-saw picture would appear to be a vindication of the standard ‘subtraction’ model of secularisation: ‘the common notion that the secular is Michael Kirwan
在世俗中生存:信仰,悲伤,恶搞
在《一个乡村牧师的日记》中,乔治·伯南诺斯描绘了一幅令人不安的画面:教会不仅……一种拥有法律、官员、军队的主权国家——这是人类历史上一个多么辉煌的时刻。教会在时间的长河中行进,就像一个兵团在一个陌生的国度中行进,它的日常补给被切断了。教会依赖于连续不断的政权和社会,就像士兵日复一日地依赖于居民一样我知道军事占领的比喻是有问题的,考虑到欧洲目前的战争状态,但我对它大胆而诚实的断言很感兴趣,即教会与它所占据的空间(即使只是暂时的)之间存在某种寄生关系。我们如何想象教会在后基督教世界的生存?是否有可能,正如伯纳诺斯所暗示的那样,当代教会,显然已经筋疲力尽,空空如也,仍然可以从它的环境中汲取养分——无论当地居民多么冷漠或充满敌意?虽然没有忽略贝纳诺斯的逃亡团,但我将在结论中提出,音乐术语“恶搞”可能更好地描述他心目中的依赖关系。关于教会后基督教世界的生存,还有其他迹象表明,未来可能与一般预测的不同。克劳福德·格里本在《基督教爱尔兰的兴衰》一书中总结了一些引人注目的断言:过去的基督教爱尔兰终于结束了——基督徒应该感到高兴……曾经的基督教爱尔兰已经消亡。但它的批评者不能放松,就像信徒不应该绝望一样格里本的书讲述了爱尔兰基督教的“兴衰”,因为我们纪念了爱尔兰崛起的历史标志,它作为一个现代世俗国家的“成熟”(1922年独立,1972年宪法修正案取消了天主教会的“特殊地位”)。这幅跷跷板的画面似乎证明了世俗化的标准“减法”模型:“世俗就是迈克尔·柯万的普遍观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书