Does spending on social-welfare policies reduce poverty? An assessment of the European Union countries using impulse-response and efficiency methods

Krzysztof Kutwa, Jakub Sawulski
{"title":"Does spending on social-welfare policies reduce poverty? An assessment of the European Union countries using impulse-response and efficiency methods","authors":"Krzysztof Kutwa, Jakub Sawulski","doi":"10.15290/oes.2022.01.107.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – An attempt to answer two questions: (i) does spending on social-welfare policies constitute a statistically-significant impulse for reducing poverty among various risk groups in the EU countries? And (ii) what is the level of efficiency of social spending when it comes to reducing various problems associated with poverty in the EU member states? Research method – Two research methods: Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and extended Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are used. Results – It is established that social-welfare policies in most of the EU countries create a sufficient impulse to reduce poverty among elderly people and survivors, families with children and the unemployed. However, the impulse is often not sufficient in the case of people with problems in meeting housing needs, as well as the sick or disabled. What is more, the relative efficiency of social-welfare spending in some of the EU countries is low, which suggest that better outcomes may be achieved not only by increasing the spending, but also by improving the policies among current amount of funds. Surprisingly, the best-performing countries in reducing the poverty by social-welfare policies include, next to Denmark and Finland, also some Central and Eastern European countries: the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – The research extends the knowledge on the efficiency and effectiveness of government activities for the purpose of limiting poverty.","PeriodicalId":33011,"journal":{"name":"Optimum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2022.01.107.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – An attempt to answer two questions: (i) does spending on social-welfare policies constitute a statistically-significant impulse for reducing poverty among various risk groups in the EU countries? And (ii) what is the level of efficiency of social spending when it comes to reducing various problems associated with poverty in the EU member states? Research method – Two research methods: Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and extended Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are used. Results – It is established that social-welfare policies in most of the EU countries create a sufficient impulse to reduce poverty among elderly people and survivors, families with children and the unemployed. However, the impulse is often not sufficient in the case of people with problems in meeting housing needs, as well as the sick or disabled. What is more, the relative efficiency of social-welfare spending in some of the EU countries is low, which suggest that better outcomes may be achieved not only by increasing the spending, but also by improving the policies among current amount of funds. Surprisingly, the best-performing countries in reducing the poverty by social-welfare policies include, next to Denmark and Finland, also some Central and Eastern European countries: the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – The research extends the knowledge on the efficiency and effectiveness of government activities for the purpose of limiting poverty.
在社会福利政策上的支出能减少贫困吗?使用脉冲响应和效率方法对欧盟国家进行评估
目的-试图回答两个问题:(i)在社会福利政策上的支出是否构成了减少欧盟国家各种风险群体贫困的统计上显著的推动力?(ii)在减少欧盟成员国与贫困相关的各种问题时,社会支出的效率水平是多少?研究方法:采用向量误差修正模型(VECM)和扩展数据包络分析(DEA)两种研究方法。结果-已经确定,大多数欧盟国家的社会福利政策创造了足够的动力来减少老年人和幸存者,有孩子的家庭和失业者中的贫困。然而,对于那些在满足住房需求方面有问题的人,以及病人或残疾人,这种冲动往往是不够的。此外,一些欧盟国家社会福利支出的相对效率较低,这表明不仅可以通过增加支出,还可以通过改善现有资金数量的政策来实现更好的结果。令人惊讶的是,在通过社会福利政策减少贫困方面表现最好的国家,除了丹麦和芬兰,还有一些中欧和东欧国家:捷克共和国、波兰、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚。原创性/价值/影响/建议-这项研究扩展了关于政府为限制贫穷而进行的活动的效率和效力的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信