Małżeństwa w międzywojennej rodzinie chłopskiej w świetle dokumentów kościelnych na przykładzie diecezji kieleckiej

Regina Renz
{"title":"Małżeństwa w międzywojennej rodzinie chłopskiej w świetle dokumentów kościelnych na przykładzie diecezji kieleckiej","authors":"Regina Renz","doi":"10.15290/CNISK.2021.02.11.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patriarchal family model, promoted by religious institutions, was the most prevalent in the rural areas. Role models, associated with patriarchal family, promoted in the catholic press, exposed features of men, such as resourcefulness, care for his wife and home, meanwhile, for women, these were features such as economy, kindness, care for her children and husband. People looked for future wives and husbands among neighbours, neighbouring villages and in the nearest area. Within traditional rural areas, basic criteria of marriage was the size of the lands owned by the families of the spouses, as well as owned money capital. Love and mutual attraction were desired but not required in this model. Those, who managed to combine “decent” conditions of the future marriage with elation of heart, were considered the lucky ones. Introducing couples by matchmakers, friends or family members had to guarantee “choosable” choices. Religious concept of marriage assumed that procreation is its main objective. It disregarded divorce and considered conscious maternity inconsistent with catholic morality. In practice, Catholics didn’t obey behaviour models promoted by the Church. Church’s ethical principles about the binding nature of marriage and the ones banning living without entering marriage, weren’t fully respected. Based on the survey conducted among priests in diocese of Kielce regarding family morality among congregation in years 192–1929, we learn that in just a few parishes self-willed separations and living without marriage were observed. The main reason behind separations were property issues, irreconcilable differences, infertility, illness or brutality of one of the spouses. Also, ban imposed on birth planning and control wasn’t generally respected. All of the above proves changes that were taking place in marriage and family relations in peasant families during inter-war period.","PeriodicalId":34781,"journal":{"name":"Czasopismo Naukowe Instytutu Studiow Kobiecych","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czasopismo Naukowe Instytutu Studiow Kobiecych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/CNISK.2021.02.11.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patriarchal family model, promoted by religious institutions, was the most prevalent in the rural areas. Role models, associated with patriarchal family, promoted in the catholic press, exposed features of men, such as resourcefulness, care for his wife and home, meanwhile, for women, these were features such as economy, kindness, care for her children and husband. People looked for future wives and husbands among neighbours, neighbouring villages and in the nearest area. Within traditional rural areas, basic criteria of marriage was the size of the lands owned by the families of the spouses, as well as owned money capital. Love and mutual attraction were desired but not required in this model. Those, who managed to combine “decent” conditions of the future marriage with elation of heart, were considered the lucky ones. Introducing couples by matchmakers, friends or family members had to guarantee “choosable” choices. Religious concept of marriage assumed that procreation is its main objective. It disregarded divorce and considered conscious maternity inconsistent with catholic morality. In practice, Catholics didn’t obey behaviour models promoted by the Church. Church’s ethical principles about the binding nature of marriage and the ones banning living without entering marriage, weren’t fully respected. Based on the survey conducted among priests in diocese of Kielce regarding family morality among congregation in years 192–1929, we learn that in just a few parishes self-willed separations and living without marriage were observed. The main reason behind separations were property issues, irreconcilable differences, infertility, illness or brutality of one of the spouses. Also, ban imposed on birth planning and control wasn’t generally respected. All of the above proves changes that were taking place in marriage and family relations in peasant families during inter-war period.
从教会文献看两次世界大战农民家庭的婚姻——以基尔切教区为例
在宗教机构的推动下,宗法家庭模式在农村地区最为盛行。与父权家庭相关的角色榜样,在天主教媒体中得到推广,暴露了男性的特征,如足智多谋,照顾妻子和家庭,同时,对于女性来说,这些特征是经济,善良,照顾孩子和丈夫。人们在邻居、邻近的村庄和最近的地区寻找未来的妻子和丈夫。在传统的农村地区,婚姻的基本标准是配偶家庭拥有的土地的大小,以及拥有的货币资本。在这个模型中,爱和相互吸引是需要的,但不是必需的。那些能够将未来婚姻的“体面”条件与内心的喜悦结合起来的人被认为是幸运的。由媒人、朋友或家人介绍的新人必须保证“可选择的”选择。宗教婚姻观假定生育是其主要目的。它无视离婚,认为有意识的母性与天主教道德不一致。在实践中,天主教徒并不遵守教会倡导的行为模式。教会关于婚姻具有约束力的道德原则,以及禁止未婚同居的道德原则,没有得到充分尊重。根据对Kielce教区神父在192-1929年间对会众的家庭道德进行的调查,我们了解到,只有少数教区出现了自愿分居和不结婚的情况。离婚的主要原因是财产问题、不可调和的分歧、不育、疾病或配偶一方的残暴。此外,对计划生育和控制的禁令也没有得到普遍尊重。这些都证明了两次世界大战期间农民家庭婚姻家庭关系发生的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信