TREATMENT SATISFACTION: A NEGLECTED BUT IMPORTANT OUTCOME MEASURE IN OLDER PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

JAR life Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jarcp.2017.14
H. Langerman, R. Gadsby
{"title":"TREATMENT SATISFACTION: A NEGLECTED BUT IMPORTANT OUTCOME MEASURE IN OLDER PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES","authors":"H. Langerman, R. Gadsby","doi":"10.14283/jarcp.2017.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the effect of comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) in elderly referred to a rehabilitation unit. This article describes the considerations behind the study. Design: Participants were randomized to either CGC or standard care. Setting: Participants were recruited from two community care rehabilitation units in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark, in the period between 2012 and 2015. Participants: Inclusion: Elderly patients aged 65 and older admitted from home or hospital. Exclusion: Persons receiving palliative care or assessed by a geriatrician during the past month. Intervention: Medical history, physical examination, blood tests, medication adjustment and follow-up by a geriatrician. The control group received standard care with the general practitioners (GPs) as back-up. Outcomes: Primary outcome: Hospital contacts drawn from national registers. Secondary outcomes: GPs contacts, institutionalization, medication status and mortality collected from national registers and Activities of daily living (ADL), physical and cognitive function and quality of life measures collected by a blinded occupational therapist. All outcomes were assessed at day 10, 30 and 90 after arrival at the rehabilitation unit. Conclusion: A new model of care for elderly referred to community rehabilitation was developed and implemented. The potential benefits of this model were compared with usual care in a community rehabilitation unit in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. We hypothesized that the geriatrician-performed CGC in elderly referred to a rehabilitation unit will reduce the hospital contacts by 25 % without increase in mortality and in contacts to GPs and home care services. We expect that this model will prevent deterioration in ADL, and physical and cognitive functioning, and reduce the risk of institutionalization. If the results are positive, community rehabilitation services should be encouraged to change their routines for treatment of this population accordingly.","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jarcp.2017.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) in elderly referred to a rehabilitation unit. This article describes the considerations behind the study. Design: Participants were randomized to either CGC or standard care. Setting: Participants were recruited from two community care rehabilitation units in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark, in the period between 2012 and 2015. Participants: Inclusion: Elderly patients aged 65 and older admitted from home or hospital. Exclusion: Persons receiving palliative care or assessed by a geriatrician during the past month. Intervention: Medical history, physical examination, blood tests, medication adjustment and follow-up by a geriatrician. The control group received standard care with the general practitioners (GPs) as back-up. Outcomes: Primary outcome: Hospital contacts drawn from national registers. Secondary outcomes: GPs contacts, institutionalization, medication status and mortality collected from national registers and Activities of daily living (ADL), physical and cognitive function and quality of life measures collected by a blinded occupational therapist. All outcomes were assessed at day 10, 30 and 90 after arrival at the rehabilitation unit. Conclusion: A new model of care for elderly referred to community rehabilitation was developed and implemented. The potential benefits of this model were compared with usual care in a community rehabilitation unit in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. We hypothesized that the geriatrician-performed CGC in elderly referred to a rehabilitation unit will reduce the hospital contacts by 25 % without increase in mortality and in contacts to GPs and home care services. We expect that this model will prevent deterioration in ADL, and physical and cognitive functioning, and reduce the risk of institutionalization. If the results are positive, community rehabilitation services should be encouraged to change their routines for treatment of this population accordingly.
治疗满意度:老年2型糖尿病患者中一个被忽视但重要的结局指标
目的:探讨综合老年护理(CGC)对转诊到某康复中心的老年人的治疗效果。本文描述了这项研究背后的考虑因素。设计:参与者随机分为CGC组和标准治疗组。背景:2012年至2015年期间,参与者从丹麦奥胡斯市的两个社区护理康复单位招募。参与者:纳入:65岁及以上从家庭或医院入院的老年患者。排除:在过去一个月内接受姑息治疗或由老年病专家评估的人。干预措施:病史、体格检查、血液检查、药物调整和老年医生的随访。对照组以全科医生(gp)作为后备,接受标准治疗。结果:主要结果:来自国家登记的医院接触者。次要结果:全科医生联系、机构、药物状况和死亡率,这些数据来自国家登记册和日常生活活动(ADL),身体和认知功能以及由盲法职业治疗师收集的生活质量测量。在到达康复病房后的第10、30和90天对所有结果进行评估。结论:建立并实施了一种社区康复的老年护理新模式。在一项实用的随机临床试验中,将该模型的潜在益处与社区康复单位的常规护理进行了比较。我们假设,在转介到康复单位的老年人中,由老年病医生进行的CGC将减少25%的医院接触,而不会增加死亡率和与全科医生和家庭护理服务的接触。我们期望这种模式能够防止ADL、身体和认知功能的恶化,并降低制度化的风险。如果结果是积极的,应鼓励社区康复服务机构相应地改变其治疗这一人群的常规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信