Os diferentes olhares sobre humanização da assistência na Atenção Básica à Saúde

H. C. S. Souza, K. M. D. Sampaio, M. C. A. Pereira, M. Nunes
{"title":"Os diferentes olhares sobre humanização da assistência na Atenção Básica à Saúde","authors":"H. C. S. Souza, K. M. D. Sampaio, M. C. A. Pereira, M. Nunes","doi":"10.14393/rep-v19n12020-49828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Humanization Policy was created, in 2003, to reiterate the principles from the Universal Health System (free translation from Sistema Único de Saúde) in its daily practices of attention and management. This research aimed to discuss about the perceptions regarding the humanized service in the main health areas. A bibliographic survey was performed in the databases SciELO, MEDLINE/PUBMED, and LILACS, with studies published in the last 10 years, finding 19 papers which met the inclusion requirements: articles which aimed to evaluate the perception of professionals regarding humanization and complete texts. An exploratory reading of the resumes, materials/methods and results of the articles was performed, which were divided in tables, being characterized about samples, objective, and main results found and analised about the methodological quality via PEDro Scale. The articles approached the factors which improved the work processes, such as: sheltering, accessibility, teamwork and participative management. Regarding methodological quality, only four studies filled the requirements, with score equal to 6 or greater. The results were analysed in three aspects: the humanizing concept; being humanized in health; and the user in the context of assistance humanization. It was found out that this is a theme of extreme efficacy for the work process, creating the need for new studies.","PeriodicalId":31487,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Educacao Popular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Educacao Popular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/rep-v19n12020-49828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Humanization Policy was created, in 2003, to reiterate the principles from the Universal Health System (free translation from Sistema Único de Saúde) in its daily practices of attention and management. This research aimed to discuss about the perceptions regarding the humanized service in the main health areas. A bibliographic survey was performed in the databases SciELO, MEDLINE/PUBMED, and LILACS, with studies published in the last 10 years, finding 19 papers which met the inclusion requirements: articles which aimed to evaluate the perception of professionals regarding humanization and complete texts. An exploratory reading of the resumes, materials/methods and results of the articles was performed, which were divided in tables, being characterized about samples, objective, and main results found and analised about the methodological quality via PEDro Scale. The articles approached the factors which improved the work processes, such as: sheltering, accessibility, teamwork and participative management. Regarding methodological quality, only four studies filled the requirements, with score equal to 6 or greater. The results were analysed in three aspects: the humanizing concept; being humanized in health; and the user in the context of assistance humanization. It was found out that this is a theme of extreme efficacy for the work process, creating the need for new studies.
对初级卫生保健人性化援助的不同看法
2003年制定了国家人性化政策,以重申全民卫生系统(Sistema Único de Saúde)在日常关注和管理实践中的原则。本研究旨在探讨主要卫生领域对人性化服务的看法。我们在SciELO、MEDLINE/PUBMED和LILACS数据库中进行了书目调查,调查了过去10年发表的研究,发现19篇论文符合纳入要求:旨在评估专业人员对人性化和完整文本的看法的文章。对简历、材料/方法和文章的结果进行探索性阅读,将其分为表格,对样本、目标和发现的主要结果进行表征,并通过佩德罗量表对方法学质量进行分析。文章探讨了改善工作流程的因素,如:遮蔽、可及性、团队合作和参与式管理。在方法学质量方面,只有4项研究符合要求,得分等于或大于6分。结果从三个方面进行了分析:人性化理念;健康人性化;并在用户辅助的背景下实现人性化。人们发现,这是一个对工作过程极端有效的主题,因此需要进行新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信