A Hybrid ARIMA and RBF Neural Network Model for Tourist Quantity Forecasting : A Case Study for Chiangmai Province

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
et.al Rati Wongsathan
{"title":"A Hybrid ARIMA and RBF Neural Network Model for Tourist Quantity Forecasting : A Case Study for Chiangmai Province","authors":"et.al Rati Wongsathan","doi":"10.14456/KKURJ.2016.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applications of a single model may not be able to capture different data patterns well enough, especially in the tourist forecast problem which is often complex in nature. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) is a famous linear model while an artificial neural network (ANN) is a promising alternative to a traditional linear method. The ARIMA model may not be adequate for nonlinear problems while ANN can well reveal the correlation of nonlinear patterns. However, overfitting due to a learning process is the main disadvantage of ANN as well as being trapped in a local optimum for parameters optimization. To improve the forecast performance of both ARIMA and ANN for high accuracy, the two hybridization models, i.e. hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model and hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model are employed to examine the Chiangmai’s tourist time series data. Statistics test and parameter designed experiments were used to optimize these models and the sum-square of error (SSE) was used to indicate their performances. In this case study, the hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model has proved that the RBFNN can priori capture the non-stationary non-linear component while the fully linearly stationary residuals were accurately predicted by ARIMA. The experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model outperformed 42% by averaging over the hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model, an improvement of hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model, RBFNN model, and ARIMA model.","PeriodicalId":8597,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/KKURJ.2016.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Applications of a single model may not be able to capture different data patterns well enough, especially in the tourist forecast problem which is often complex in nature. An autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) is a famous linear model while an artificial neural network (ANN) is a promising alternative to a traditional linear method. The ARIMA model may not be adequate for nonlinear problems while ANN can well reveal the correlation of nonlinear patterns. However, overfitting due to a learning process is the main disadvantage of ANN as well as being trapped in a local optimum for parameters optimization. To improve the forecast performance of both ARIMA and ANN for high accuracy, the two hybridization models, i.e. hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model and hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model are employed to examine the Chiangmai’s tourist time series data. Statistics test and parameter designed experiments were used to optimize these models and the sum-square of error (SSE) was used to indicate their performances. In this case study, the hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model has proved that the RBFNN can priori capture the non-stationary non-linear component while the fully linearly stationary residuals were accurately predicted by ARIMA. The experimental results demonstrated that the hybrid RBFNN-ARIMA model outperformed 42% by averaging over the hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model, an improvement of hybrid ARIMA-RBFNN model, RBFNN model, and ARIMA model.
基于ARIMA和RBF神经网络的旅游数量预测模型——以清迈省为例
单一模型的应用可能无法很好地捕获不同的数据模式,特别是在复杂的旅游预测问题中。自回归积分移动平均(ARIMA)是一种著名的线性模型,而人工神经网络(ANN)是一种很有前途的替代传统线性方法。ARIMA模型可能不适用于非线性问题,而人工神经网络可以很好地揭示非线性模式的相关性。然而,由于学习过程导致的过拟合是人工神经网络的主要缺点,并且在参数优化时陷入局部最优。为了提高ARIMA和ANN的预测精度,采用混合ARIMA- rbfnn模型和混合RBFNN-ARIMA模型对清迈旅游时间序列数据进行检验。采用统计检验和参数设计实验对模型进行优化,并用误差平方和(SSE)评价模型的性能。在这个案例中,RBFNN-ARIMA混合模型证明了RBFNN可以先验地捕获非平稳的非线性分量,而ARIMA可以准确地预测完全线性平稳的残差。实验结果表明,混合RBFNN-ARIMA模型比混合ARIMA-RBFNN模型(混合ARIMA-RBFNN模型、RBFNN模型和ARIMA模型的改进)的平均性能高出42%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology
Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信