Indywidualna stylistyka autora w przekładzie literackim na pzrykładzie powieści Joanny Bator "Piaskowa góra" i jej tłumaczenia na język niemiecki

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Dawid Łuczak
{"title":"Indywidualna stylistyka autora w przekładzie literackim na pzrykładzie powieści Joanny Bator \"Piaskowa góra\" i jej tłumaczenia na język niemiecki","authors":"Dawid Łuczak","doi":"10.12775/RP.2018.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To merely mention such skills or qualifications of a literary translator as perfect knowledge of a target language or literary skills would be a cliche. Much more interesting aspects of the art of literary translation emerge when it comes to taking strategic decisions concerning how far the translator can trust the reader in deliberate violation of conventions in the target language and culture or how close the translator can near the limit of acceptability. This Polish-German contrastive analysis of extracts of Joanna Bator’s novel, in which the author in an unconventional way works with her language, was conducted on the basis of German philosopher Friedrich Schleiermacher’s well known idea of dichotomy in the theory of literary translation, which employs domestication and foreignisation strategies, with the concepts of style, personal aesthetics and formal-aesthetic equivalence, as well as on the basis of Esther Kinsky’s theorethical essay „Fremdsprechen. Gedanken zum Ubersetzen”. Kinsky, the translator of Joanna Bator’s novel, suggests that a certain level of foreignisation in translation should be preserved . This theoretical assumption is virtually applied by Kinsky, foreignization being her main translation strategy. In the process of translation Kinsky also takes more radical steps of omitting or neutralising certain passages, thus diminishing their semantic strength. By analysing a literary text we can determine to what extent the strategies that the translator uses are justified or when the decision to implement a domestication strategy erases certain value of the text and creates only an illusion of authenticity, or vice versa – when foreignisation which goes too far makes the text unclear to the reader. Translation techniques employed by Kinsky are, as we may presume, the effect of the translator’s attempt to reach the balance between adequacy and acceptability, which are so crucial in the art of translation.","PeriodicalId":33180,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Przekladoznawczy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Przekladoznawczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/RP.2018.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To merely mention such skills or qualifications of a literary translator as perfect knowledge of a target language or literary skills would be a cliche. Much more interesting aspects of the art of literary translation emerge when it comes to taking strategic decisions concerning how far the translator can trust the reader in deliberate violation of conventions in the target language and culture or how close the translator can near the limit of acceptability. This Polish-German contrastive analysis of extracts of Joanna Bator’s novel, in which the author in an unconventional way works with her language, was conducted on the basis of German philosopher Friedrich Schleiermacher’s well known idea of dichotomy in the theory of literary translation, which employs domestication and foreignisation strategies, with the concepts of style, personal aesthetics and formal-aesthetic equivalence, as well as on the basis of Esther Kinsky’s theorethical essay „Fremdsprechen. Gedanken zum Ubersetzen”. Kinsky, the translator of Joanna Bator’s novel, suggests that a certain level of foreignisation in translation should be preserved . This theoretical assumption is virtually applied by Kinsky, foreignization being her main translation strategy. In the process of translation Kinsky also takes more radical steps of omitting or neutralising certain passages, thus diminishing their semantic strength. By analysing a literary text we can determine to what extent the strategies that the translator uses are justified or when the decision to implement a domestication strategy erases certain value of the text and creates only an illusion of authenticity, or vice versa – when foreignisation which goes too far makes the text unclear to the reader. Translation techniques employed by Kinsky are, as we may presume, the effect of the translator’s attempt to reach the balance between adequacy and acceptability, which are so crucial in the art of translation.
从乔安娜·巴特尔的小说《沙丘》及其德语翻译看文学翻译中作者的个性文体学
仅仅把文学译者的这种技能或资格说成是对目标语言的完美了解或文学技巧是陈词滥调。文学翻译艺术中更有趣的方面是,当涉及到译者在多大程度上信任读者,故意违反目标语言和文化的惯例,或者译者在多大程度上接近可接受的极限时,就会出现策略决策。本文以德国哲学家弗里德里希·施莱尔马赫在文学翻译理论中著名的二分法思想为基础,对乔安娜·巴托的小说节选进行了波兰和德国的对比分析,其中作者以一种非常规的方式使用了她的语言,该理论采用了归化和异化策略,并采用了风格,个人美学和形式美学对等的概念。并以埃斯特·金斯基的理论论文《自由说教》为基础。Gedanken zum Ubersetzen”。乔安娜•巴特尔小说的译者金斯基认为,翻译中应保留一定程度的异化。这一理论假设被金斯基无形中运用,异化是她的主要翻译策略。在翻译过程中,金斯基还采取了更为激进的措施,省略或中和某些段落,从而削弱了它们的语义强度。通过分析文学文本,我们可以确定译者使用的策略在多大程度上是合理的,或者当决定实施归化策略时抹杀了文本的某些价值,只创造了一种真实的幻觉,反之亦然-当异化过于严重使读者无法理解文本时。我们可以认为,金斯基所采用的翻译技巧是译者试图在翻译艺术中至关重要的充分性和可接受性之间取得平衡的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rocznik Przekladoznawczy
Rocznik Przekladoznawczy Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书