Different household formation systems in Hungary at the end of the eighteenth century: variations on John Hajnal's thesis.

T. Faragó
{"title":"Different household formation systems in Hungary at the end of the eighteenth century: variations on John Hajnal's thesis.","authors":"T. Faragó","doi":"10.12759/HSR.23.1998.1/2.83-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"John Hajnal's pathbreaking paper about the European marriage patterns and his household formation theory provoked high interest [among] researchers even far beyond the border of the historical demographic research. Examining them through the Hungarian sources we can say that both the declared factors and variables of household formation and their regional strength and territorial distribution cannot be interpreted unanimously and adequately with the rules established by John Hajnal. Maybe it is better not to think in universalistic regimes but, moreover, adapt a regional and temporal frame of reference.\"","PeriodicalId":73243,"journal":{"name":"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research","volume":"1 1","pages":"83-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historische Sozialforschung = Historical social research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.23.1998.1/2.83-111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

"John Hajnal's pathbreaking paper about the European marriage patterns and his household formation theory provoked high interest [among] researchers even far beyond the border of the historical demographic research. Examining them through the Hungarian sources we can say that both the declared factors and variables of household formation and their regional strength and territorial distribution cannot be interpreted unanimously and adequately with the rules established by John Hajnal. Maybe it is better not to think in universalistic regimes but, moreover, adapt a regional and temporal frame of reference."
18世纪末匈牙利不同的家庭形成制度:约翰·哈伊纳尔论文的变体。
“约翰·哈杰纳尔关于欧洲婚姻模式和他的家庭形成理论的开创性论文引起了研究人员的高度兴趣,甚至远远超出了历史人口统计学研究的范围。通过匈牙利的资料考察,我们可以说,家庭形成的公开因素和变量及其区域强度和地域分布都不能用约翰·哈伊纳尔建立的规则一致和充分地解释。也许最好不要考虑普遍主义的制度,而是采用一个区域和时间的参考框架。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信