"He Grows Kind": Reimagining Community in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice

IF 0.1 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Joanna Huh
{"title":"\"He Grows Kind\": Reimagining Community in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice","authors":"Joanna Huh","doi":"10.1353/jem.2022.a902584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay takes up the question of community in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice (ca. 1600) to explore alternative models that challenge the violently homogenizing and xenophobic society of Christian Venice. Through Antonio and Shylock's bond-of-flesh, the play invites audiences to witness the genesis and development of a new mode of interrelationality, evoked by the melancholic condition, propelled by desire for violence, and ensured through risking death. Drawing from Georges Bataille's \"law,\" which insists that human beings are only united to each other through rents and wounds, this article details the way that The Merchant of Venice mobilizes an imaginative possibility whereby damage and vulnerability constitute communion. Contrasting such communion with Venetian sociality, this essay identifies the paradox that sociality—premised as it is on the protection of integral, bounded selves and undergirded by the ideology of possessive individualism—disallows the union for which sacrificial communion strives. Unexpectedly, the destruction and self-abnegation expressed by both Antonio and Shylock catalyze a costly and crucial rethinking of community, one that privileges risk and loss over the rational self-preservation essential to the Christian republican view of community.","PeriodicalId":42614,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"107 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2022.a902584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This essay takes up the question of community in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice (ca. 1600) to explore alternative models that challenge the violently homogenizing and xenophobic society of Christian Venice. Through Antonio and Shylock's bond-of-flesh, the play invites audiences to witness the genesis and development of a new mode of interrelationality, evoked by the melancholic condition, propelled by desire for violence, and ensured through risking death. Drawing from Georges Bataille's "law," which insists that human beings are only united to each other through rents and wounds, this article details the way that The Merchant of Venice mobilizes an imaginative possibility whereby damage and vulnerability constitute communion. Contrasting such communion with Venetian sociality, this essay identifies the paradox that sociality—premised as it is on the protection of integral, bounded selves and undergirded by the ideology of possessive individualism—disallows the union for which sacrificial communion strives. Unexpectedly, the destruction and self-abnegation expressed by both Antonio and Shylock catalyze a costly and crucial rethinking of community, one that privileges risk and loss over the rational self-preservation essential to the Christian republican view of community.
“他变得善良”:莎士比亚《威尼斯商人》中对社区的重新想象
本文以莎士比亚的《威尼斯商人》(约1600年)中的社区问题为研究对象,探索挑战基督教威尼斯极端同质化和排外主义社会的其他模式。通过安东尼奥和夏洛克的血肉纽带,该剧邀请观众见证了一种新的相互关系模式的起源和发展,这种关系由忧郁的状态引发,由暴力的欲望推动,并通过冒着死亡的危险来保证。从乔治·巴塔耶的“法律”出发,坚持人类只有通过撕裂和创伤才能彼此结合,这篇文章详细描述了《威尼斯商人》如何动员一种想象的可能性,即破坏和脆弱构成了交流。通过与威尼斯社会的对比,本文发现了一个悖论,即社会——以保护完整的、有限的自我为前提,并以占有性个人主义的意识形态为基础——不允许牺牲性共融为之奋斗的联盟。出乎意料的是,安东尼奥和夏洛克所表达的毁灭和自我克制促成了对社区的一次代价高昂且至关重要的反思,这种反思将风险和损失置于基督教共和主义社区观所必需的理性自我保护之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信