Rebalancing the extra-judicial scales: Documentary aesthetics and the legacy of the Central Park Five

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Synapse Pub Date : 2021-07-19 DOI:10.12681/syn.27562
Sofia Baliño Rios
{"title":"Rebalancing the extra-judicial scales: Documentary aesthetics and the legacy of the Central Park Five","authors":"Sofia Baliño Rios","doi":"10.12681/syn.27562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Central Park jogger case has returned to news headlines with the 2019 Netflix mini-series When They See Us, a dramatised account of the original trials. It has reignited debate over the injustices faced by the Black community in the United States, and led to lawsuits and job resignations on the part of former police investigators and prosecutors. Since the case’s inception, issues of race, media reporting, economics, and the identity of New York City have influenced the trial and its aftermath and have inspired documentaries, books, and the landmark 1990 essay “Sentimental Journeys” by Joan Didion. In this article, I argue that the creators of two of these works, by testing the boundaries of narrative, demonstrate that the case was inexorably tainted by a pervasive feeling of social precarity and racial prejudice which cost five young men several years of their lives, and offer a productive line of enquiry for acknowledging such factors and their influence, if not resolving them.","PeriodicalId":22131,"journal":{"name":"Synapse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synapse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/syn.27562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Central Park jogger case has returned to news headlines with the 2019 Netflix mini-series When They See Us, a dramatised account of the original trials. It has reignited debate over the injustices faced by the Black community in the United States, and led to lawsuits and job resignations on the part of former police investigators and prosecutors. Since the case’s inception, issues of race, media reporting, economics, and the identity of New York City have influenced the trial and its aftermath and have inspired documentaries, books, and the landmark 1990 essay “Sentimental Journeys” by Joan Didion. In this article, I argue that the creators of two of these works, by testing the boundaries of narrative, demonstrate that the case was inexorably tainted by a pervasive feeling of social precarity and racial prejudice which cost five young men several years of their lives, and offer a productive line of enquiry for acknowledging such factors and their influence, if not resolving them.
司法外尺度的再平衡:纪录片美学与中央公园五人组的遗产
随着2019年Netflix的迷你剧《当他们看到我们》(When They See Us)的播出,中央公园慢跑者案重新成为新闻头条,这部剧对最初的审判进行了戏剧化的描述。它重新引发了关于美国黑人社区所面临的不公正的辩论,并导致了前警察调查员和检察官的诉讼和辞职。自案件开始以来,种族、媒体报道、经济和纽约市的身份问题影响了审判及其后果,并激发了纪录片、书籍和1990年琼·迪迪安(Joan Didion)里程碑式的文章《感伤之旅》(Sentimental Journeys)。在本文中,我认为其中两部作品的创作者,通过对叙事边界的测试,证明了这个案件被一种普遍存在的社会不稳定感和种族偏见无情地玷污了,这种感觉使五个年轻人失去了几年的生命,并为承认这些因素及其影响提供了一条富有成效的调查路线,如果不能解决这些因素的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Synapse
Synapse 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SYNAPSE publishes articles concerned with all aspects of synaptic structure and function. This includes neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, neuromodulators, receptors, gap junctions, metabolism, plasticity, circuitry, mathematical modeling, ion channels, patch recording, single unit recording, development, behavior, pathology, toxicology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信