Expérimentations et évaluations en fouille de textes : un panorama des campagnes DEFT édit. by Cyril Grouin et Dominic Forest (review)

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
L. Grivel
{"title":"Expérimentations et évaluations en fouille de textes : un panorama des campagnes DEFT édit. by Cyril Grouin et Dominic Forest (review)","authors":"L. Grivel","doi":"10.1353/ILS.2014.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"that must be checked to see what they are (and in doing this just for this review I had to force myself back to writing instead of delving into the Web). I will value both books for course preparation as there is unique content in each that will contribute, for example, to content on searching grey literature to inform health policy. However, if I could keep only one, for the quantity of new-to-me content, it would have to be Expert Internet Searching. Among the content that I appreciated most for course preparation is a comparison of clustering search engines such as Carrot2 in chapter 5 and Visual Searching in chapter 8. Chapter 11, “Academic and Other Specialized Search Engines,” sets these specialized “niche market” products apart in a way that reinforces for me that information and resources must be “fit for purpose” and begs the question why we health librarians pay so much to make resources designed for academics available to health services workers without knowing for sure that these workers have enough time or capacity to search for and then synthesize multiple primary research articles to meet their day-to-day practice-based information needs. Chapter 14, “Hints and Tips on Better Searching with Sample Search Examples,” includes pointers for testing search skills, getting the most out of browsers, and setting up personal home pages for expert searchers. I have been digging into the evolving concept of expert searching and have yet to identify recent work that provides an explicit solid, modern foundation to support expert searchers who need both a common language and standard methods to select between and then guide different search processes. This book does not set out to meet these needs, but throughout and specifically in chapter 16, “The Future of Search,” it does expand the horizons of what constitutes expert searching beyond what was imaginable just a few years ago.","PeriodicalId":43727,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Information et De Bibliotheconomie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ILS.2014.0004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Information et De Bibliotheconomie","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ILS.2014.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

that must be checked to see what they are (and in doing this just for this review I had to force myself back to writing instead of delving into the Web). I will value both books for course preparation as there is unique content in each that will contribute, for example, to content on searching grey literature to inform health policy. However, if I could keep only one, for the quantity of new-to-me content, it would have to be Expert Internet Searching. Among the content that I appreciated most for course preparation is a comparison of clustering search engines such as Carrot2 in chapter 5 and Visual Searching in chapter 8. Chapter 11, “Academic and Other Specialized Search Engines,” sets these specialized “niche market” products apart in a way that reinforces for me that information and resources must be “fit for purpose” and begs the question why we health librarians pay so much to make resources designed for academics available to health services workers without knowing for sure that these workers have enough time or capacity to search for and then synthesize multiple primary research articles to meet their day-to-day practice-based information needs. Chapter 14, “Hints and Tips on Better Searching with Sample Search Examples,” includes pointers for testing search skills, getting the most out of browsers, and setting up personal home pages for expert searchers. I have been digging into the evolving concept of expert searching and have yet to identify recent work that provides an explicit solid, modern foundation to support expert searchers who need both a common language and standard methods to select between and then guide different search processes. This book does not set out to meet these needs, but throughout and specifically in chapter 16, “The Future of Search,” it does expand the horizons of what constitutes expert searching beyond what was imaginable just a few years ago.
文本挖掘中的实验和评估:DEFT运动的全景,由Cyril Grouin和Dominic Forest编辑(评论)
必须检查它们是什么(为了这篇评论,我不得不强迫自己回到写作中,而不是深入研究网络)。我将重视这两本书的课程准备,因为每本书都有独特的内容,例如,对搜索灰色文献以告知卫生政策的内容有贡献。然而,如果我只能保留一个,对于新内容的数量,它必须是专家互联网搜索。在课程准备中,我最欣赏的内容是第5章的Carrot2和第8章的Visual Searching对聚类搜索引擎的比较。第11章,“学术和其他专业搜索引擎”将这些专门的“利基市场”产品区分开来,以一种方式强化我的观点,即信息和资源必须“符合目的”,并回避了一个问题,即为什么我们卫生图书馆员要花这么多钱为卫生服务工作者提供专为学术设计的资源,而不确定这些工作者是否有足够的时间或能力搜索并综合多个主要研究文章,以满足他们日常基于实践的信息需求。第14章,“使用示例搜索示例进行更好的搜索的提示和技巧”,包括测试搜索技能,充分利用浏览器以及为专家搜索者设置个人主页的指针。我一直在深入研究专家搜索的不断发展的概念,并且还没有发现最近的工作提供了一个明确的、坚实的、现代的基础来支持专家搜索者,他们需要一种共同的语言和标准的方法来选择,然后指导不同的搜索过程。这本书并没有着手满足这些需求,但是在整个过程中,特别是在第16章“搜索的未来”中,它确实扩展了构成专家搜索的视野,超出了几年前的想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science is recognized internationally for its authoritative bilingual contributions to the field of information science. Established in 1976, the journal is dedicated to the publication of research findings, both in full-length and in brief format; reviews of books; software and technology; and letters to the editor. The editorial policy of the journal is to continue the advancement of information and library science in both English and French Canada by serving as a forum for discussion of theory and research. The journal is concerned with research findings, understanding the issues in the field, and understanding the history, economics, technology, and human behaviour of information library systems and services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信