Simfield: A Computer Simulated Visual Field Test to Screen for Glaucoma

J. Hellman, Marie E. Perrone, Diego Altamirano, L. Farrokh-siar, A. Anchala, S. Ksiazek
{"title":"Simfield: A Computer Simulated Visual Field Test to Screen for Glaucoma","authors":"J. Hellman, Marie E. Perrone, Diego Altamirano, L. Farrokh-siar, A. Anchala, S. Ksiazek","doi":"10.12974/2309-6136.2016.04.01.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a computer simulated visual field test (Simfield) as a screening tool for glaucoma.\nDesign/Participants/Methods: 36 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect patients (53 eyes) from one ophthalmology clinic between October 2013 and May 2014 used the Simfield program within six months of a reliable performance on a 24-2 SITA standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer Exam. The exam measured threshold values at the same 54 points as the 24-2 SITA standard software as well as false positives, false negatives, and fixation losses. Two glaucoma specialists and one general ophthalmologist analyzed the Simfield results in masked fashion and determined whether there was evidence of a glaucomatous defect in any of the 4 quadrants of each field. These results were compared to the corresponding HFA tests to determine sensitivity and specificity.\nResults: The sensitivity of Simfield ranged from 51-76% and the specificity was 67-88%. In a sub analysis that eliminated mild defects, defined as defects in a field with mean deviation < 7.0, sensitivity improved to 75-91% and specificity was 69-91%. The average false positive rate was 5.2%, the average false negative rate was 3.7%, and the average fixation loss rate was 27.7%.\nConclusions: Simfield is an effective test for identifying moderate to severe glaucomatous visual field loss and can be accessed from any home computer. While the cost to detect glaucoma in one patient using current screening methods is estimated at $1000, Simfield can be used for free anywhere that a computer is available. ","PeriodicalId":73874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ocular diseases and therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ocular diseases and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2309-6136.2016.04.01.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a computer simulated visual field test (Simfield) as a screening tool for glaucoma. Design/Participants/Methods: 36 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect patients (53 eyes) from one ophthalmology clinic between October 2013 and May 2014 used the Simfield program within six months of a reliable performance on a 24-2 SITA standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer Exam. The exam measured threshold values at the same 54 points as the 24-2 SITA standard software as well as false positives, false negatives, and fixation losses. Two glaucoma specialists and one general ophthalmologist analyzed the Simfield results in masked fashion and determined whether there was evidence of a glaucomatous defect in any of the 4 quadrants of each field. These results were compared to the corresponding HFA tests to determine sensitivity and specificity. Results: The sensitivity of Simfield ranged from 51-76% and the specificity was 67-88%. In a sub analysis that eliminated mild defects, defined as defects in a field with mean deviation < 7.0, sensitivity improved to 75-91% and specificity was 69-91%. The average false positive rate was 5.2%, the average false negative rate was 3.7%, and the average fixation loss rate was 27.7%. Conclusions: Simfield is an effective test for identifying moderate to severe glaucomatous visual field loss and can be accessed from any home computer. While the cost to detect glaucoma in one patient using current screening methods is estimated at $1000, Simfield can be used for free anywhere that a computer is available. 
Simfield:计算机模拟视野测试筛选青光眼
目的:评价计算机模拟视野试验(Simfield)作为青光眼筛查工具的有效性。设计/参与者/方法:2013年10月至2014年5月间,来自一家眼科诊所的36例青光眼或疑似青光眼患者(53只眼)使用Simfield程序,在6个月内通过24-2 SITA标准汉弗莱视野分析仪测试,表现可靠。该测试测量的阈值与24-2 SITA标准软件相同,为54分,以及假阳性、假阴性和固定损失。两名青光眼专家和一名普通眼科医生以蒙面方式分析Simfield结果,并确定在每个领域的4个象限中的任何一个象限中是否存在青光眼缺陷的证据。将这些结果与相应的HFA测试进行比较,以确定敏感性和特异性。结果:Simfield的敏感性为51 ~ 76%,特异性为67 ~ 88%。在排除轻度缺陷(定义为平均偏差< 7.0的缺陷)的子分析中,灵敏度提高到75-91%,特异性为69-91%。平均假阳性率为5.2%,平均假阴性率为3.7%,平均固定丢失率为27.7%。结论:Simfield是一种识别中度至重度青光眼视野丧失的有效测试方法,可在任何一台家用电脑上使用。虽然使用目前的筛查方法检测一名青光眼患者的成本估计为1000美元,但Simfield可以在任何有电脑的地方免费使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信