Selection of a hospital for a transfer: the roles of patients, families, physicians and payers.

W. Gombeski, D. Konrad, G. Kanoti, S. Ulreich, J. Skilogianis, J. Clough
{"title":"Selection of a hospital for a transfer: the roles of patients, families, physicians and payers.","authors":"W. Gombeski, D. Konrad, G. Kanoti, S. Ulreich, J. Skilogianis, J. Clough","doi":"10.1300/J043V12N01_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThis study investigates the reasons for hospital transfers and the role patients, their families, physicians, and payers play in the choice of a referral center.\n\n\nDATA SOURCES\nA thirty-three item questionnaire and clinical data from the hospital's discharge database.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA study of all 307 hospital transfer patients admitted between November 9 and December 3, 1993 was conducted to understand the factors contributing to the increase in transfers and the reasons patients were sent to CCH. Data on the transfer decision were collected by interviewing patients 48 hours after admittance to the hospital or by telephone if they were discharged before an interview could be completed. Two hundred and sixty-two (85%) patients were interviewed.\n\n\nPRINCIPLE FINDINGS\n(1) Almost 58% of transfers were patient-initiated or -influenced; the remainder were physician- (38%) or payer-directed (4%); (2) More than 78% of the patients identified lack of clinical expertise/technology at originating hospital as the main reason for transferring. Other reasons included: established CCH patient status (43%), CCH marketing (31%), and concerns regarding quality of care at originating hospital (10%). Financial and quality dumping were not identified as reasons for the transfer. New patients to CCH were more likely to indicate that marketing and lack of clinical resources at originating hospital were reasons for selecting CCH than previous patients.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients significantly influenced the transfer decision and the transfer decision-making process can be influenced by marketing. The opinions of the consumer should not be underestimated, especially by those seeking non-marketing solutions to health care reform.","PeriodicalId":79671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital marketing","volume":"12 1 1","pages":"61-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J043V12N01_04","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J043V12N01_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study investigates the reasons for hospital transfers and the role patients, their families, physicians, and payers play in the choice of a referral center. DATA SOURCES A thirty-three item questionnaire and clinical data from the hospital's discharge database. STUDY DESIGN A study of all 307 hospital transfer patients admitted between November 9 and December 3, 1993 was conducted to understand the factors contributing to the increase in transfers and the reasons patients were sent to CCH. Data on the transfer decision were collected by interviewing patients 48 hours after admittance to the hospital or by telephone if they were discharged before an interview could be completed. Two hundred and sixty-two (85%) patients were interviewed. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS (1) Almost 58% of transfers were patient-initiated or -influenced; the remainder were physician- (38%) or payer-directed (4%); (2) More than 78% of the patients identified lack of clinical expertise/technology at originating hospital as the main reason for transferring. Other reasons included: established CCH patient status (43%), CCH marketing (31%), and concerns regarding quality of care at originating hospital (10%). Financial and quality dumping were not identified as reasons for the transfer. New patients to CCH were more likely to indicate that marketing and lack of clinical resources at originating hospital were reasons for selecting CCH than previous patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients significantly influenced the transfer decision and the transfer decision-making process can be influenced by marketing. The opinions of the consumer should not be underestimated, especially by those seeking non-marketing solutions to health care reform.
选择转诊医院:病人、家属、医生和付款人的角色。
目的探讨转诊的原因,以及患者、家属、医生和付款人在转诊中心选择中的作用。数据来源来自医院出院数据库的33项问卷调查和临床数据。研究设计对1993年11月9日至12月3日住院的307名转院患者进行了研究,以了解导致转院人数增加的因素以及患者被送往CCH的原因。关于转院决定的数据是在病人入院48小时后通过访谈收集的,如果病人在访谈完成前出院,则通过电话收集。对262例(85%)患者进行了访谈。主要发现(1)几乎58%的转院是由患者发起或受其影响的;其余的是医生(38%)或付款人指导(4%);(2)超过78%的患者认为原住医院缺乏临床专业知识/技术是转院的主要原因。其他原因包括:已建立的CCH患者状态(43%)、CCH营销(31%)和对原医院护理质量的担忧(10%)。财务和质量倾销并没有被确定为转移的原因。与以前的患者相比,新到CCH的患者更有可能表示原医院的营销和缺乏临床资源是选择CCH的原因。结论患者对迁移决策有显著影响,市场营销对迁移决策过程有影响。消费者的意见不应被低估,尤其是那些寻求医疗改革非营销解决方案的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信