{"title":"Oratoria e umorismo latino in Cicerone: idee per l’inventio tra ars e tradizione","authors":"Francesca Boldrer","doi":"10.13135/2532-5353/4127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the significance of humour in Roman oratory, a theme dear to Cicero, who claimed expertise in it, and central to book 2 of the De oratore . In a long passage of the work (§§ 216-290), Cicero offers a detailed and systematic account of inventio that fleshes out the sketch presented in the Rhetorica ad Herennium . I argue that Cicero treats this controversial topic in Roman oratory with a sensitivity to the broad range of differing viewpoints held by established orators (including his own teachers). He does so by expertly managing the fine distinction between innovation and tradition, between Greek theoretical works and anthologies of Latin jokes (some of which were compiled by members of illustrious gentes ), between utilitas and humanitas . Il contributo intende approfondire l’importanza dell’umorismo nell’oratoria romana, un tema caro a Cicerone, che ne era esperto, e centrale nel II libro del De oratore. In un’ampia sezione dell’opera (§§ 216-290) l’autore offre un’esposizione dettagliata e sistematica a conclusione dell’inventio, superando largamente gli scarni spunti presenti nella Rhetorica ad Herennium. L’argomento, singolarmente controverso sul piano retorico nel mondo romano per questioni tecniche (ars) e di decorum, viene affrontato da Cicerone con abile dialettica tra diverse e mutevoli opinioni, attribuite ad autorevoli e arguti oratori e ai suoi maestri, ricercando un prudente equilibrio tra innovazione e tradizione, tra trattati greci teorici e raccolte di facezie latine (risalenti anche a membri delle gentes piu illustri), tra utilitas e humanitas. La contribution vise a approfondir l’importance de l’humour dans l’art oratoire romain, un theme cher a Ciceron, qui en etait un expert, et au centre du deuxieme livre du De oratore. Dans une grande partie de l’ouvrage (§§ 216-290), l’auteur propose une exposition detaillee et systematique a la conclusion de l’inventio, depassant de loin les maigres indices presents dans la Rhetorica ad Herennium. Le sujet, singulierement controverse sur le plan rhetorique dans le monde romain pour les questions techniques (ars) et de decorum, est aborde par Ciceron avec une dialectique intelligente entre des opinions differentes et changeantes, attribuees aux orateurs influents et pleins d’esprit et a ses maitres, a la recherche d’un equilibre prudent entre innovation et tradition, entre traites theoriques grecs et recueils de faceties latines (remontant aussi aux membres des plus illustres gentes), entre utilitas et humanitas.","PeriodicalId":31844,"journal":{"name":"Ciceroniana On Line","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciceroniana On Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2532-5353/4127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper studies the significance of humour in Roman oratory, a theme dear to Cicero, who claimed expertise in it, and central to book 2 of the De oratore . In a long passage of the work (§§ 216-290), Cicero offers a detailed and systematic account of inventio that fleshes out the sketch presented in the Rhetorica ad Herennium . I argue that Cicero treats this controversial topic in Roman oratory with a sensitivity to the broad range of differing viewpoints held by established orators (including his own teachers). He does so by expertly managing the fine distinction between innovation and tradition, between Greek theoretical works and anthologies of Latin jokes (some of which were compiled by members of illustrious gentes ), between utilitas and humanitas . Il contributo intende approfondire l’importanza dell’umorismo nell’oratoria romana, un tema caro a Cicerone, che ne era esperto, e centrale nel II libro del De oratore. In un’ampia sezione dell’opera (§§ 216-290) l’autore offre un’esposizione dettagliata e sistematica a conclusione dell’inventio, superando largamente gli scarni spunti presenti nella Rhetorica ad Herennium. L’argomento, singolarmente controverso sul piano retorico nel mondo romano per questioni tecniche (ars) e di decorum, viene affrontato da Cicerone con abile dialettica tra diverse e mutevoli opinioni, attribuite ad autorevoli e arguti oratori e ai suoi maestri, ricercando un prudente equilibrio tra innovazione e tradizione, tra trattati greci teorici e raccolte di facezie latine (risalenti anche a membri delle gentes piu illustri), tra utilitas e humanitas. La contribution vise a approfondir l’importance de l’humour dans l’art oratoire romain, un theme cher a Ciceron, qui en etait un expert, et au centre du deuxieme livre du De oratore. Dans une grande partie de l’ouvrage (§§ 216-290), l’auteur propose une exposition detaillee et systematique a la conclusion de l’inventio, depassant de loin les maigres indices presents dans la Rhetorica ad Herennium. Le sujet, singulierement controverse sur le plan rhetorique dans le monde romain pour les questions techniques (ars) et de decorum, est aborde par Ciceron avec une dialectique intelligente entre des opinions differentes et changeantes, attribuees aux orateurs influents et pleins d’esprit et a ses maitres, a la recherche d’un equilibre prudent entre innovation et tradition, entre traites theoriques grecs et recueils de faceties latines (remontant aussi aux membres des plus illustres gentes), entre utilitas et humanitas.
本文研究了幽默在罗马演讲中的重要性,这是西塞罗所珍视的主题,他声称自己是这方面的专家,也是《演讲》第二卷的中心。在作品的一长段(§§216-290)中,西塞罗提供了一个详细而系统的发明描述,充实了《修辞学与千年》中呈现的草图。我认为西塞罗在处理罗马演讲中这个有争议的话题时,对知名演说家(包括他自己的老师)所持有的广泛不同观点很敏感。他通过熟练地处理创新与传统、希腊理论著作与拉丁笑话选集(其中一些是由杰出的氏族成员编写的)、功利主义与人道主义之间的细微区别,做到了这一点。我将为以下活动作出贡献:加强罗马歌剧歌剧的重要性、加强歌剧歌剧的重要性、加强歌剧歌剧的重要性、加强歌剧歌剧的重要性、加强歌剧歌剧的重要性。在歌剧中(§§216-290),作者提供了一种新发明,一种新发明,一种新发明,一种新发明,一种新发明。论证,单一论证,单一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证,统一论证。他的贡献包括:“幽默的重要性”、“演讲艺术的重要性”、“主题的重要性”、“专家的重要性”、“演讲艺术的重要性”和“演讲艺术的重要性”。Dans une grande partie de l 'ouvrage(§§216-290),l 'auteur提出了一个详细的论述和系统的结论,l ' invent, despassant de loin les maigres indices提出了Dans la修辞和千年。主题,单一性,争议,主题,修辞,主题,世界,主题,问题,技巧,礼仪,主题,主题,辩证法,智慧,主题,意见,差异,变化,属性,主题,影响,主题,主题,主题,主题,平衡,主题,创新,传统,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题,主题。功利主义和人道主义。