10 Critical Steps of Hiatal Hernia Repair and Anti-Reflux Surgery: An Expert Consensus and Literature Review

Madison Tyle, Madison Noom, Alec Bigness, A. Saad, R. Acho, Abdul-Rahman F. Diab, J. Sujka, C. DuCoin
{"title":"10 Critical Steps of Hiatal Hernia Repair and Anti-Reflux Surgery: An Expert Consensus and Literature Review","authors":"Madison Tyle, Madison Noom, Alec Bigness, A. Saad, R. Acho, Abdul-Rahman F. Diab, J. Sujka, C. DuCoin","doi":"10.1177/26345161231190069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is significant variability in the treatment of hiatal hernias, which has led to various perspectives regarding the proper manner of dissection, repair, and reconstruction. We sought to evaluate and analyze expert opinions, survey data, and the literature to define the critical steps in hiatal hernia repair. Methods: A focus group (focus) of expert foregut surgeons defined and agreed upon a sequence of critical steps of a hiatal hernia repair. Using the data from the focus group, an anonymous survey was compiled and distributed to members of the American Foregut Society (AFS). The survey data (survey) was then compared to the focus for agreement. The compiled focus and survey data was interpreted as expert recommendation (expert). A literature review (literature) was then conducted and compared to expert data for agreement and evaluation of discordance. This was used to define the critical steps of hiatal hernia repair. Results: Of the 10 identified critical steps, there was agreement on 9 of 10 steps between focus and survey. The 1 step with discordance was supported by the literature. Conclusions: Ten critical steps have been identified to help produce a succinct and reproducible approach to hiatal hernia repair. It is believed that adherence to these steps will allow the surgeon to achieve a safe and successful hiatal repair.","PeriodicalId":73049,"journal":{"name":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","volume":"108 1","pages":"270 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231190069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is significant variability in the treatment of hiatal hernias, which has led to various perspectives regarding the proper manner of dissection, repair, and reconstruction. We sought to evaluate and analyze expert opinions, survey data, and the literature to define the critical steps in hiatal hernia repair. Methods: A focus group (focus) of expert foregut surgeons defined and agreed upon a sequence of critical steps of a hiatal hernia repair. Using the data from the focus group, an anonymous survey was compiled and distributed to members of the American Foregut Society (AFS). The survey data (survey) was then compared to the focus for agreement. The compiled focus and survey data was interpreted as expert recommendation (expert). A literature review (literature) was then conducted and compared to expert data for agreement and evaluation of discordance. This was used to define the critical steps of hiatal hernia repair. Results: Of the 10 identified critical steps, there was agreement on 9 of 10 steps between focus and survey. The 1 step with discordance was supported by the literature. Conclusions: Ten critical steps have been identified to help produce a succinct and reproducible approach to hiatal hernia repair. It is believed that adherence to these steps will allow the surgeon to achieve a safe and successful hiatal repair.
裂孔疝修补和抗反流手术的10个关键步骤:专家共识和文献综述
背景:裂孔疝的治疗有很大的差异,这导致了关于正确的剥离、修复和重建方式的不同观点。我们试图评估和分析专家意见、调查数据和文献,以确定裂孔疝修补的关键步骤。方法:由专家前肠外科医生组成的焦点小组确定并商定了裂孔疝修补的一系列关键步骤。利用焦点小组的数据,汇编了一份匿名调查,并分发给美国肠道学会(AFS)的成员。然后将调查数据(调查)与焦点进行比较以达成一致。汇编的焦点和调查数据解释为专家推荐(专家)。然后进行文献回顾(文献),并与专家数据进行比较,以达成一致并评估不一致。这被用来定义裂孔疝修补的关键步骤。结果:在确定的10个关键步骤中,焦点和调查之间的10个步骤中有9个是一致的。不协调的1步得到文献支持。结论:十个关键步骤已经确定,以帮助产生一个简洁和可重复的方法裂孔疝修补。相信坚持这些步骤将使外科医生获得安全和成功的裂孔修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信