Using tree rings to detect a CO2 fertilization effect: a global review

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2023-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s00468-023-02438-w
Benjamin Laffitte, Barnabas C. Seyler, Pengbo Li, Zhengang Ha, Ya Tang
{"title":"Using tree rings to detect a CO2 fertilization effect: a global review","authors":"Benjamin Laffitte,&nbsp;Barnabas C. Seyler,&nbsp;Pengbo Li,&nbsp;Zhengang Ha,&nbsp;Ya Tang","doi":"10.1007/s00468-023-02438-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p>Evidence for the CFE was mixed. New dendrochronological experimental designs are needed, especially in tropical and boreal biomes. A weakness of current methodologies could impede the ability to detect a CFE.</p><h3>Abstract</h3><p>The effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on plant growth and the carbon cycle have stimulated extensive research. Over the last three decades, CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment experiments have tested the CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect (CFE) hypothesis. Yet, CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment studies have been criticized for having unrealistic designs. Multiple studies have sought to use tree-ring analyses to verify the CFE under more natural conditions. To assess the breadth of scholarship about CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization on tree radial growth, this study conducted a tri-lingual (English, French, and Chinese) literature review. Finding no French, just one Chinese, and 73 English articles directly related to this topic, all 74 relevant tree-ring studies (1984–2020) were reviewed in-depth. We found an underrepresentation of studies from key regions important to the global carbon cycle, particularly tropical and boreal biomes. Evidence for the CFE was mixed: about 32.4% of dendrochronological studies found a CFE, another 23% found radial growth trends explained by both CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization and other climatic variables, 5.4% attributed tree growth only to climate change, and 39.2% (primarily in tropical areas) did not find any evidence of a CFE. Synthesized results of global scholarship highlight the need for new dendrochronological experimental designs to exclude climatic and environmental variables and test whether CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization occurs in tropical regions. Furthermore, weakness of current methodologies could lessen the ability to detect a CFE. More focused research is necessary from under-represented regions, and to test the effects of increasing anthropogenic activities (such as localized elevated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions) on tree growth in nature settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"37 5","pages":"1299 - 1314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-023-02438-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Key message

Evidence for the CFE was mixed. New dendrochronological experimental designs are needed, especially in tropical and boreal biomes. A weakness of current methodologies could impede the ability to detect a CFE.

Abstract

The effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on plant growth and the carbon cycle have stimulated extensive research. Over the last three decades, CO2 enrichment experiments have tested the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE) hypothesis. Yet, CO2 enrichment studies have been criticized for having unrealistic designs. Multiple studies have sought to use tree-ring analyses to verify the CFE under more natural conditions. To assess the breadth of scholarship about CO2 fertilization on tree radial growth, this study conducted a tri-lingual (English, French, and Chinese) literature review. Finding no French, just one Chinese, and 73 English articles directly related to this topic, all 74 relevant tree-ring studies (1984–2020) were reviewed in-depth. We found an underrepresentation of studies from key regions important to the global carbon cycle, particularly tropical and boreal biomes. Evidence for the CFE was mixed: about 32.4% of dendrochronological studies found a CFE, another 23% found radial growth trends explained by both CO2 fertilization and other climatic variables, 5.4% attributed tree growth only to climate change, and 39.2% (primarily in tropical areas) did not find any evidence of a CFE. Synthesized results of global scholarship highlight the need for new dendrochronological experimental designs to exclude climatic and environmental variables and test whether CO2 fertilization occurs in tropical regions. Furthermore, weakness of current methodologies could lessen the ability to detect a CFE. More focused research is necessary from under-represented regions, and to test the effects of increasing anthropogenic activities (such as localized elevated CO2 emissions) on tree growth in nature settings.

Abstract Image

利用树木年轮探测二氧化碳施肥效应:全球综述
关键信息:支持CFE的证据好坏参半。需要新的树木年代学实验设计,特别是在热带和北方生物群落中。当前方法的弱点可能会阻碍检测CFE的能力。摘要大气二氧化碳浓度升高对植物生长和碳循环的影响引起了广泛的研究。在过去的三十年中,CO2富集实验已经验证了CO2施肥效应(CFE)假说。然而,二氧化碳富集研究被批评为不切实际的设计。许多研究试图使用树木年轮分析来验证更自然条件下的CFE。为了评估CO2施肥对树木径向生长的影响,本研究进行了三语(英语、法语和汉语)文献综述。我们对74篇相关的树木年轮研究(1984-2020)进行了深入的回顾,没有发现与该主题直接相关的法语文章,只有一篇中文文章和73篇英文文章。我们发现,对全球碳循环至关重要的关键地区,特别是热带和北方生物群落的研究代表性不足。关于CFE的证据是混合的:大约32.4%的树木年代学研究发现了CFE,另外23%的研究发现了由CO2施肥和其他气候变量解释的径向生长趋势,5.4%的研究将树木的生长仅归因于气候变化,39.2%(主要在热带地区)没有发现任何CFE的证据。全球学术研究的综合结果强调需要新的树木年代学实验设计,以排除气候和环境变量,并测试CO2施肥是否发生在热带地区。此外,现有方法的弱点可能会降低检测CFE的能力。有必要在代表性不足的地区开展更有针对性的研究,并测试日益增加的人为活动(如局部二氧化碳排放增加)对自然环境中树木生长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信