The Attic particle μήν. Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
K. Thijs
{"title":"The Attic particle μήν. Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy","authors":"K. Thijs","doi":"10.1163/15699846-01701005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the various usages of the Attic particle μήν and proposes a unified analysis of its main function. I argue that the prevalent analysis of Wakker (1997) needs some important reconsideration when instances of μήν in Platonic dialogue are concerned. First, the particle can target not only the propositional content of a discourse act, but also its illocution (felicity conditions). Second, I propose ‘countering expectations or assumptions of the addressee’ as the basic value of the particle. Functions in terms of commitment are better seen as secondary side effects. Third, I argue that differences in the origin of the countered assumptions or expectations are a natural basis for distinguishing between attitudinal μήν (extra-linguistic context and/or previous words of the addressee) and discourse connective μήν (previous words of the same speaker). It follows from my analysis that strict categorical boundaries between these usages are not to be expected.","PeriodicalId":42386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Greek Linguistics","volume":"17 1","pages":"73-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15699846-01701005","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Greek Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01701005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The paper examines the various usages of the Attic particle μήν and proposes a unified analysis of its main function. I argue that the prevalent analysis of Wakker (1997) needs some important reconsideration when instances of μήν in Platonic dialogue are concerned. First, the particle can target not only the propositional content of a discourse act, but also its illocution (felicity conditions). Second, I propose ‘countering expectations or assumptions of the addressee’ as the basic value of the particle. Functions in terms of commitment are better seen as secondary side effects. Third, I argue that differences in the origin of the countered assumptions or expectations are a natural basis for distinguishing between attitudinal μήν (extra-linguistic context and/or previous words of the addressee) and discourse connective μήν (previous words of the same speaker). It follows from my analysis that strict categorical boundaries between these usages are not to be expected.
阁楼粒子μ语录。主体间性、对比与多义
本文考察了Attic粒子μ ν的各种用法,并对其主要功能提出了统一的分析。我认为对Wakker(1997)的流行分析需要一些重要的重新考虑,当柏拉图对话中的μ口头记载。首先,语词不仅可以针对语篇行为的命题内容,还可以针对语篇行为的言外之意(幸福条件)。其次,我建议“反对收件人的期望或假设”作为助词的基本价值。承诺方面的功能最好被视为次要副作用。第三,我认为被反驳的假设或期望的起源上的差异是区分态度的μ口头记录ν(语言外语境和/或收件人的前一个词)和话语连接的μ口头记录ν(同一说话人的前一个词)的自然基础。根据我的分析,这些用法之间不会有严格的分类界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Greek Linguistics
Journal of Greek Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
42 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信