Sociological Theory and the Human Relations School

S. Ackroyd
{"title":"Sociological Theory and the Human Relations School","authors":"S. Ackroyd","doi":"10.1177/009392857634001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three common and influential approaches to the work of the human relations school extant in the literature. These three approaches, though superficially plausible, actually give rise to serious misconceptions about the nature of the work of this school, as well as to faulty interpretations of its development and demise. After identifying and criticising these inadequate approaches, this paper proceeds to offer a new account of the work of this group of writers based on a more adequate methodology for assessing ideas. This approach sees ideas as being applied to a developing \"problem context,\" itself changing in response to the process of research. Finally, it is argued that the results of this reassessment have implications not only for our understanding of the work of the human relations school, but also for the practice of industrial sociology today.","PeriodicalId":85554,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of work and occupations","volume":"3 1","pages":"379 - 410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009392857634001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of work and occupations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009392857634001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There are three common and influential approaches to the work of the human relations school extant in the literature. These three approaches, though superficially plausible, actually give rise to serious misconceptions about the nature of the work of this school, as well as to faulty interpretations of its development and demise. After identifying and criticising these inadequate approaches, this paper proceeds to offer a new account of the work of this group of writers based on a more adequate methodology for assessing ideas. This approach sees ideas as being applied to a developing "problem context," itself changing in response to the process of research. Finally, it is argued that the results of this reassessment have implications not only for our understanding of the work of the human relations school, but also for the practice of industrial sociology today.
社会学理论与人际关系学派
现存文献中有三种常见且有影响力的方法来研究人际关系学派的工作。这三种方法虽然表面上看似合理,但实际上却导致了对该学派工作性质的严重误解,以及对其发展和消亡的错误解释。在识别和批评这些不充分的方法之后,本文继续提供一种基于评估思想的更充分的方法的这组作家的工作的新帐户。这种方法将思想应用于发展中的“问题背景”,而“问题背景”本身会随着研究过程的变化而变化。最后,本文认为,这种重新评估的结果不仅对我们对人际关系学派的工作的理解有影响,而且对今天的工业社会学实践也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信