The 'Old' Anti-Diabetic Agents: A Systematic Inventory.

Susanne Buhse, I. Mühlhauser, M. Lenz
{"title":"The 'Old' Anti-Diabetic Agents: A Systematic Inventory.","authors":"Susanne Buhse, I. Mühlhauser, M. Lenz","doi":"10.1159/000439369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An array of oral agents is available for the treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. This systematic inventory focuses on 'old' oral agents, including metformin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, and meglitinides. Twelve meta-analyses and six randomized controlled trials that used patient-relevant outcomes as primary endpoints were critically reviewed. Guidelines recommend the use of metformin or an SU as the first-line pharmacotherapeutic options. Beneficial effects of metformin have been demonstrated for 'any diabetes-related endpoint' and 'all-cause mortality' in small study groups of overweight and obese patients with newly manifested type 2 diabetes. Various SU agents are available, for which a class effect has clearly been disproven. Beneficial effects have only been demonstrated for glyburide in preventing microvascular complications. Thiazolidinediones have been withdrawn from the markets in some countries. Meta-analyses found an increased coronary risk for rosiglitazone. The benefit-to-risk ratios of alpha glucosidase inhibitors and meglitinides regarding hard endpoints remain uncertain. Diabetes treatment is complex and individualised. We identified several studies focusing on the efficacy of treatment policies rather than on single drug effects. However, as long as the efficacy of single agents regarding hard clinical endpoints is unclear, interpretation of study results on treatment policies remains speculative.","PeriodicalId":72906,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000439369","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000439369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

An array of oral agents is available for the treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. This systematic inventory focuses on 'old' oral agents, including metformin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, and meglitinides. Twelve meta-analyses and six randomized controlled trials that used patient-relevant outcomes as primary endpoints were critically reviewed. Guidelines recommend the use of metformin or an SU as the first-line pharmacotherapeutic options. Beneficial effects of metformin have been demonstrated for 'any diabetes-related endpoint' and 'all-cause mortality' in small study groups of overweight and obese patients with newly manifested type 2 diabetes. Various SU agents are available, for which a class effect has clearly been disproven. Beneficial effects have only been demonstrated for glyburide in preventing microvascular complications. Thiazolidinediones have been withdrawn from the markets in some countries. Meta-analyses found an increased coronary risk for rosiglitazone. The benefit-to-risk ratios of alpha glucosidase inhibitors and meglitinides regarding hard endpoints remain uncertain. Diabetes treatment is complex and individualised. We identified several studies focusing on the efficacy of treatment policies rather than on single drug effects. However, as long as the efficacy of single agents regarding hard clinical endpoints is unclear, interpretation of study results on treatment policies remains speculative.
“老”抗糖尿病药物:系统清单。
一系列口服药物可用于治疗2型糖尿病的高血糖。该系统清单侧重于“老”口服药物,包括二甲双胍、磺脲类药物、噻唑烷二酮类药物、α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和美格列汀类药物。我们对以患者相关结局为主要终点的12项荟萃分析和6项随机对照试验进行了批判性回顾。指南建议使用二甲双胍或SU作为一线药物治疗选择。二甲双胍对“任何糖尿病相关终点”和“全因死亡率”的有益作用已在超重和肥胖新表现为2型糖尿病患者的小型研究小组中得到证实。各种各样的SU药剂都是可用的,这类效应显然已经被证明是错误的。只有格列本脲在预防微血管并发症方面的有益作用得到证实。噻唑烷二酮类药物已在一些国家撤出市场。荟萃分析发现罗格列酮可增加冠心病风险。关于硬终点,α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和美格列内酯的获益-风险比仍不确定。糖尿病的治疗是复杂和个体化的。我们确定了几项研究,重点关注治疗政策的有效性,而不是单一药物的效果。然而,只要单一药物对硬临床终点的疗效尚不清楚,对治疗政策的研究结果的解释仍然是推测性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信