Reliability of a Test for Assessment of Isometric Trunk Muscle Strength in Elderly Women

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Marceli M A Mesquita, M. S. Santos, A. B. Vasconcelos, C. De Sá, Luana C D Pereira, Ínea B. M. da Silva-Santos, W. M. da Silva Júnior, D. G. de Matos, A. D. S. Fontes, P. Oliveira, F. Aidar, J. DeSantana, I. Fernandes, M. D. Da Silva-Grigoletto
{"title":"Reliability of a Test for Assessment of Isometric Trunk Muscle Strength in Elderly Women","authors":"Marceli M A Mesquita, M. S. Santos, A. B. Vasconcelos, C. De Sá, Luana C D Pereira, Ínea B. M. da Silva-Santos, W. M. da Silva Júnior, D. G. de Matos, A. D. S. Fontes, P. Oliveira, F. Aidar, J. DeSantana, I. Fernandes, M. D. Da Silva-Grigoletto","doi":"10.1155/2019/9061839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of a protocol using the maximal isometric strength test of the trunk in elderly women aged above 60 years, without low back pain. Methods Twenty-one physically inactive elderly women, who had not engaged in any activity or exercise program in the past three months, participated in the cross-sectional study that consisted of two days of evaluations for the maximal isometric strength of the extensor and flexor muscles of the trunk, with a 48 h interval between the sessions. A platform with fixed seating was used, which allowed the fixation of the hip and lower limbs, with a load cell connected to a linear encoder. To verify the reliability of the test, the interclass correlation coefficient, variation coefficient, minimum detectable difference (MDD), standard error of measurement, and Bland–Altman graphs were calculated. Results No statistical difference was observed between the first and second evaluation, which indicates that there was no learning effect. Interclass correlation coefficient values were classified as very high and high for extensor (0.98) and flexor (0.86) muscles, respectively, besides low variation (9% for both muscle groups) and acceptable values for minimum detectable difference (extensors = 51.1 N, flexors = 48.9 N). In addition, the Bland–Altman analysis revealed low bias and values within the limits of agreement. Conclusion It is concluded that the test of maximum isometric strength of the trunk in healthy and trained elderly people presents high reliability. These values proved to be reliable if performed in at least two evaluation sessions, which confirms the hypothesis of the authors by the consistency of the measurement test.","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2019 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/9061839","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9061839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of a protocol using the maximal isometric strength test of the trunk in elderly women aged above 60 years, without low back pain. Methods Twenty-one physically inactive elderly women, who had not engaged in any activity or exercise program in the past three months, participated in the cross-sectional study that consisted of two days of evaluations for the maximal isometric strength of the extensor and flexor muscles of the trunk, with a 48 h interval between the sessions. A platform with fixed seating was used, which allowed the fixation of the hip and lower limbs, with a load cell connected to a linear encoder. To verify the reliability of the test, the interclass correlation coefficient, variation coefficient, minimum detectable difference (MDD), standard error of measurement, and Bland–Altman graphs were calculated. Results No statistical difference was observed between the first and second evaluation, which indicates that there was no learning effect. Interclass correlation coefficient values were classified as very high and high for extensor (0.98) and flexor (0.86) muscles, respectively, besides low variation (9% for both muscle groups) and acceptable values for minimum detectable difference (extensors = 51.1 N, flexors = 48.9 N). In addition, the Bland–Altman analysis revealed low bias and values within the limits of agreement. Conclusion It is concluded that the test of maximum isometric strength of the trunk in healthy and trained elderly people presents high reliability. These values proved to be reliable if performed in at least two evaluation sessions, which confirms the hypothesis of the authors by the consistency of the measurement test.
老年妇女躯干等长肌力测试评估的可靠性
目的本研究的目的是分析60岁以上无腰痛的老年妇女使用躯干最大等长强度测试方案的可重复性。方法21名在过去3个月内没有参加任何活动或锻炼计划的无运动的老年妇女参加了横断面研究,包括两天的躯干伸肌和屈肌的最大等长强度评估,每次评估间隔48小时。使用了一个带有固定座位的平台,可以固定髋关节和下肢,并将称重传感器连接到线性编码器。为了验证检验的信度,我们计算了类间相关系数、变异系数、最小可检测差异(MDD)、测量标准误差和Bland-Altman图。结果第一次评价与第二次评价无统计学差异,说明没有学习效果。伸肌(0.98)和屈肌(0.86)的类间相关系数值分别被分类为非常高和高,此外变化较小(两个肌群均为9%)和最小可检测差异的可接受值(伸肌= 51.1 N,屈肌= 48.9 N)。此外,Bland-Altman分析显示低偏差和在一致范围内的值。结论健康老年人躯干最大等距强度测试具有较高的可靠性。这些值被证明是可靠的,如果进行了至少两次评估会议,这证实了作者的假设,通过测量检验的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信