Galen on the Patient's Role in Pain Diagnosis: Sensation, Consensus, and Metaphor.

C. Roby
{"title":"Galen on the Patient's Role in Pain Diagnosis: Sensation, Consensus, and Metaphor.","authors":"C. Roby","doi":"10.1163/9789004305564_013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain might be a powerful diagnostic tool, but it is at the same time an intensely private and subjective experience that represents a formidable problem in the communication between physician and patient. Galen addresses (principally in De locis affectis) the problem of constructing a consistent and univocal terminology for different pain sensations, rejecting the system proposed earlier by Archigenes on the grounds that he relies on metaphorical descriptors which indiscriminately incorporate terms belonging to information generated by all the senses, fails to conform to patient testimony, and refers to ambiguous concepts. Galen sets himself the task of developing a system of proper or literal (kyrios) terms for pain sensations, even despite the apparent ineffability of certain sensations and laymen's imprecise self-analysis and description of their suffering. His pain vocabulary, developed through a combination of consensus between patients and physicians' expert descriptions of their own pain, promises to link terminology univocally to sensation, turning patients' testimony about their subjective experience of pain into universally applicable diagnostic guidance.","PeriodicalId":82835,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ancient medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":"304-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ancient medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004305564_013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Pain might be a powerful diagnostic tool, but it is at the same time an intensely private and subjective experience that represents a formidable problem in the communication between physician and patient. Galen addresses (principally in De locis affectis) the problem of constructing a consistent and univocal terminology for different pain sensations, rejecting the system proposed earlier by Archigenes on the grounds that he relies on metaphorical descriptors which indiscriminately incorporate terms belonging to information generated by all the senses, fails to conform to patient testimony, and refers to ambiguous concepts. Galen sets himself the task of developing a system of proper or literal (kyrios) terms for pain sensations, even despite the apparent ineffability of certain sensations and laymen's imprecise self-analysis and description of their suffering. His pain vocabulary, developed through a combination of consensus between patients and physicians' expert descriptions of their own pain, promises to link terminology univocally to sensation, turning patients' testimony about their subjective experience of pain into universally applicable diagnostic guidance.
盖伦论病人在疼痛诊断中的角色:感觉、共识和隐喻。
疼痛可能是一种强大的诊断工具,但它同时也是一种非常私人和主观的体验,在医患之间的沟通中代表了一个可怕的问题。盖伦解决了(主要是在De locis的影响中)为不同的疼痛感觉构建一个一致的和明确的术语的问题,拒绝了阿奇igenes早先提出的系统,理由是他依赖于隐喻性的描述符,这些描述符不加区分地包含了属于所有感官产生的信息的术语,不符合病人的证词,并且涉及模棱两可的概念。盖伦给自己设定了一项任务,即为疼痛感觉建立一套恰当的或字面上的(kyrios)术语体系,尽管某些感觉显然是不可言说的,外行人对他们的痛苦的自我分析和描述也不精确。他的疼痛词汇是通过病人和医生对自己疼痛的专家描述达成共识而发展起来的,他承诺将术语与感觉单独联系起来,将病人对疼痛的主观体验的证词变成普遍适用的诊断指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信