Pakistan: Militancy, the Transition to Democracy and Future Relations with the United States

Saeed Shafqat
{"title":"Pakistan: Militancy, the Transition to Democracy and Future Relations with the United States","authors":"Saeed Shafqat","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim210030122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pakistan's geostrategic location has made it a country of pivotal importance from the Cold War to the present day. Geography not only shapes Pakistan's foreign policy, but also its defense considerations and strategic outlook. Its crucial position in South Asia, with its proximity to the Arabian Peninsula and access to the Horn of Africa and Central Asia, make it a strategically attractive and unavoidable state for global and regional powers. China continues to be a reliable friend and considers Pakistan a window of strategic opportunity. (1) For Russia, Pakistan could offer access to \"warm waters\" if Afghanistan were to gain stability, thus improving the level of trust between the two nations. India's imminent emergence as a regional power will likely be contested by Pakistan, and the peace process between the two rivals will continue at a snail's pace. Pakistan continues to have strong cultural and strategic partnerships with Iran and Saudi Arabia. (2) Iran's nuclear ambitions, and the growing consensus among the Great Powers to curb these, may boost the geostrategic value of Pakistan in the region. With the recent construction of the Gwadar Port, which now serves as a gateway to the Gulf States, Pakistan's importance will only increase in the region. In the coming decades, as the rivalry among global powers to dominate the Indian Ocean intensifies, it becomes likely that whichever power influences the Persian Gulf will control not only the Arabian Sea but also the Indian Ocean. (3) In addition to its strategic geopolitical significance, the global war on terrorism has enhanced Pakistan's significance as a regional hub of terrorism. Pakistan is all at once a country of origin, a destination, a conduit and a victim of global jihad. According to Bruce Riedel's characterization, Pakistan has emerged as the \"critical battlefield\" in the war against global jihad. (4) In the post-9/11 world, U.S. policy toward Pakistan has undergone a paradigm shift. In less than a decade, Pakistan has graduated from being a frontline state to being a NATO ally and strategic partner. Since 2002, Pakistan has been the recipient of over $10.5 billion in U.S. military and economic assistance; and more than $1.5 billion in non-military aid is pledged annually for the next five years. (5) From an American military perspective, this region is crucial for global stability and American security as it is home to numerous countries that have supported, funded or politically backed global terrorist groups. The list includes Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Israel and India. With the exception of Israel and India, this geographical area is under the responsibility of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), currently the U.S. military's most important regional command. American-Pakistani relations are affected by several dynamics. First, it is clear that this shift in U.S.-Pakistan relations is driven primarily by a regional security imperative of which considerations of oil flow, energy needs, regional stability and the global war on terrorism are contributing factors. It is thus vital for the United States to build a strategic partnership with Pakistan. Pakistan has provided the United States with logistical support, airspace and intelligence in the 1950-60s, 1980s and today. From 1979 to 1989, Pakistan played a key role in organizing and supporting the U.S.-led Afghan resistance movement against Soviet occupation. From this period emerges many of today's global terrorism challenges. Second, the U.S. has had an abiding interest specifically in Pakistan because of Pakistan's role in Cold War policies of containment, present-day concerns over Iran, the global war on terror, a Central Asian energy corridor and Pakistan's nuclear assets. There have been \"low\" and \"high\" periods in this relationship however, depending on the size and scale of perceived threats to U.S. security interests in a given period. (6) Third, the U. …","PeriodicalId":81668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international affairs","volume":"63 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim210030122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Pakistan's geostrategic location has made it a country of pivotal importance from the Cold War to the present day. Geography not only shapes Pakistan's foreign policy, but also its defense considerations and strategic outlook. Its crucial position in South Asia, with its proximity to the Arabian Peninsula and access to the Horn of Africa and Central Asia, make it a strategically attractive and unavoidable state for global and regional powers. China continues to be a reliable friend and considers Pakistan a window of strategic opportunity. (1) For Russia, Pakistan could offer access to "warm waters" if Afghanistan were to gain stability, thus improving the level of trust between the two nations. India's imminent emergence as a regional power will likely be contested by Pakistan, and the peace process between the two rivals will continue at a snail's pace. Pakistan continues to have strong cultural and strategic partnerships with Iran and Saudi Arabia. (2) Iran's nuclear ambitions, and the growing consensus among the Great Powers to curb these, may boost the geostrategic value of Pakistan in the region. With the recent construction of the Gwadar Port, which now serves as a gateway to the Gulf States, Pakistan's importance will only increase in the region. In the coming decades, as the rivalry among global powers to dominate the Indian Ocean intensifies, it becomes likely that whichever power influences the Persian Gulf will control not only the Arabian Sea but also the Indian Ocean. (3) In addition to its strategic geopolitical significance, the global war on terrorism has enhanced Pakistan's significance as a regional hub of terrorism. Pakistan is all at once a country of origin, a destination, a conduit and a victim of global jihad. According to Bruce Riedel's characterization, Pakistan has emerged as the "critical battlefield" in the war against global jihad. (4) In the post-9/11 world, U.S. policy toward Pakistan has undergone a paradigm shift. In less than a decade, Pakistan has graduated from being a frontline state to being a NATO ally and strategic partner. Since 2002, Pakistan has been the recipient of over $10.5 billion in U.S. military and economic assistance; and more than $1.5 billion in non-military aid is pledged annually for the next five years. (5) From an American military perspective, this region is crucial for global stability and American security as it is home to numerous countries that have supported, funded or politically backed global terrorist groups. The list includes Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Israel and India. With the exception of Israel and India, this geographical area is under the responsibility of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), currently the U.S. military's most important regional command. American-Pakistani relations are affected by several dynamics. First, it is clear that this shift in U.S.-Pakistan relations is driven primarily by a regional security imperative of which considerations of oil flow, energy needs, regional stability and the global war on terrorism are contributing factors. It is thus vital for the United States to build a strategic partnership with Pakistan. Pakistan has provided the United States with logistical support, airspace and intelligence in the 1950-60s, 1980s and today. From 1979 to 1989, Pakistan played a key role in organizing and supporting the U.S.-led Afghan resistance movement against Soviet occupation. From this period emerges many of today's global terrorism challenges. Second, the U.S. has had an abiding interest specifically in Pakistan because of Pakistan's role in Cold War policies of containment, present-day concerns over Iran, the global war on terror, a Central Asian energy corridor and Pakistan's nuclear assets. There have been "low" and "high" periods in this relationship however, depending on the size and scale of perceived threats to U.S. security interests in a given period. (6) Third, the U. …
《巴基斯坦:战斗、向民主过渡以及与美国的未来关系》
巴基斯坦的地缘战略位置使其成为一个从冷战到今天举足轻重的国家。地理因素不仅决定了巴基斯坦的外交政策,也决定了巴基斯坦的国防考虑和战略前景。它在南亚的关键位置,靠近阿拉伯半岛,进入非洲之角和中亚,使其成为全球和地区大国具有战略吸引力和不可避免的国家。中国始终是可信赖的朋友,视巴基斯坦为战略机遇之窗。(1)对俄罗斯来说,如果阿富汗局势稳定,巴基斯坦可以提供“温暖水域”,从而提高两国之间的信任水平。印度即将崛起为地区大国,可能会受到巴基斯坦的挑战,这两个对手之间的和平进程将继续以蜗牛的速度进行。巴基斯坦继续与伊朗和沙特阿拉伯保持着牢固的文化和战略伙伴关系。(2)伊朗的核野心,以及大国之间日益达成的遏制伊朗核野心的共识,可能会提升巴基斯坦在该地区的地缘战略价值。随着瓜达尔港最近的建设,巴基斯坦在该地区的重要性只会增加,瓜达尔港现在是通往海湾国家的门户。在未来几十年里,随着全球大国争夺印度洋主导权的竞争加剧,无论哪个大国影响波斯湾,都有可能不仅控制阿拉伯海,还控制印度洋。(3)除了具有战略地缘政治意义外,全球反恐战争也增强了巴基斯坦作为区域恐怖主义中心的重要性。巴基斯坦同时是全球圣战的发源地、目的地、渠道和受害者。根据布鲁斯·里德尔的描述,巴基斯坦已经成为对抗全球圣战的“关键战场”。(4)在后9/11世界,美国对巴基斯坦的政策经历了范式转变。在不到十年的时间里,巴基斯坦已经从一个前线国家成长为北约的盟友和战略伙伴。自2002年以来,巴基斯坦接受了超过105亿美元的美国军事和经济援助;在今后五年里,每年承诺提供超过15亿美元的非军事援助。(5)从美国军事角度来看,该地区对全球稳定和美国安全至关重要,因为该地区有许多国家支持、资助或在政治上支持全球恐怖组织。这些国家包括巴基斯坦、伊朗、伊拉克、阿富汗、沙特阿拉伯、以色列和印度。除以色列和印度外,这一地理区域由美国中央司令部(CENTCOM)负责,该司令部目前是美军最重要的地区司令部。美巴关系受到几个因素的影响。首先,很明显,美巴关系的这种转变主要是由地区安全需求驱动的,其中考虑到石油流动、能源需求、地区稳定和全球反恐战争都是促成因素。因此,美国与巴基斯坦建立战略伙伴关系至关重要。巴基斯坦在1950-60年代、1980年代和今天向美国提供了后勤支持、领空和情报。从1979年到1989年,巴基斯坦在组织和支持美国领导的阿富汗抵抗苏联占领运动方面发挥了关键作用。今天的许多全球恐怖主义挑战就是从这一时期产生的。其次,由于巴基斯坦在冷战时期的遏制政策中所扮演的角色、当今对伊朗的担忧、全球反恐战争、中亚能源走廊以及巴基斯坦的核资产,美国一直对巴基斯坦有着持久的兴趣。然而,这种关系也有“低谷”和“高潮”时期,这取决于在特定时期对美国安全利益的威胁的大小和程度。(6)第三,U. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信