Atypical small acinar proliferation of prostate: Follow-up study of 114 patients

Kyoung Yul Lee, Yoomi Choi, Kyusang Lee, Sumi Yun, Gheeyoung Choe
{"title":"Atypical small acinar proliferation of prostate: Follow-up study of 114 patients","authors":"Kyoung Yul Lee, Yoomi Choi, Kyusang Lee, Sumi Yun, Gheeyoung Choe","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-9294.2011.01115.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is defined as atypical foci suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy. ASAP is known as a strong predictive factor associated with prostate cancer. Because the diagnostic criteria for ASAP are subjective, objective diagnostic criteria were applied for ASAP as follows: (i) total loss of basal cells confirmed by immunohistochemistry and inconspicuous nucleoli; and (ii) a minute (≤500 micrometer in length) focus of atypical glands with total loss of basal cells and prominent nucleoli. Methods: To evaluate the cancer detection rate of ASAP diagnosed by objective diagnostic criteria, 114 patients initially diagnosed with ASAP were reviewed. Results: ASAP was noted in 2.17% of prostate biopsy cases. Eighty-one patients were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (24.7%) were finally diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma by subsequent biopsy. According to the criteria, we subclassified ASAP into two groups: ASAP (not otherwise specified [NOS]) and ASAP (suspicious microscopic adenocarcinoma). ASAP (NOS) and ASAP (suspicious microscopic adenocarcinoma) showed significantly different cancer detection rates (20.3% vs 71.4%) at subsequent biopsies (P= 0.003). Sixteen patients underwent radical prostatectomy, and 13 cases (81.2%) were categorized as clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: The presence of ASAP in needle biopsy was evaluated to be an important predictor of cancer.","PeriodicalId":92990,"journal":{"name":"Basic and applied pathology","volume":"4 4","pages":"116-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1755-9294.2011.01115.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and applied pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1755-9294.2011.01115.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and aim: Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is defined as atypical foci suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy. ASAP is known as a strong predictive factor associated with prostate cancer. Because the diagnostic criteria for ASAP are subjective, objective diagnostic criteria were applied for ASAP as follows: (i) total loss of basal cells confirmed by immunohistochemistry and inconspicuous nucleoli; and (ii) a minute (≤500 micrometer in length) focus of atypical glands with total loss of basal cells and prominent nucleoli. Methods: To evaluate the cancer detection rate of ASAP diagnosed by objective diagnostic criteria, 114 patients initially diagnosed with ASAP were reviewed. Results: ASAP was noted in 2.17% of prostate biopsy cases. Eighty-one patients were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (24.7%) were finally diagnosed as having adenocarcinoma by subsequent biopsy. According to the criteria, we subclassified ASAP into two groups: ASAP (not otherwise specified [NOS]) and ASAP (suspicious microscopic adenocarcinoma). ASAP (NOS) and ASAP (suspicious microscopic adenocarcinoma) showed significantly different cancer detection rates (20.3% vs 71.4%) at subsequent biopsies (P= 0.003). Sixteen patients underwent radical prostatectomy, and 13 cases (81.2%) were categorized as clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: The presence of ASAP in needle biopsy was evaluated to be an important predictor of cancer.
114例前列腺非典型小腺泡增生的随访研究
背景与目的:不典型小腺泡增生(ASAP)被定义为可疑但不能诊断为恶性肿瘤的不典型灶。ASAP被认为是前列腺癌的一个强有力的预测因素。由于ASAP的诊断标准是主观的,故采用以下客观诊断标准:(1)免疫组织化学证实基底细胞完全丢失,核仁不明显;(ii)非典型腺体的一分钟(长度≤500微米)病灶,基底细胞完全消失,核仁突出。方法:回顾性分析114例首次诊断为ASAP的患者,以评价其客观诊断标准的癌检出率。结果:2.17%的前列腺活检病例有ASAP。81例患者成功随访。20例(24.7%)患者通过随后的活检最终诊断为腺癌。根据诊断标准,我们将ASAP分为两组:ASAP(未另行指定[NOS])和ASAP(可疑显微镜下腺癌)。在随后的活检中,ASAP (NOS)和ASAP(可疑显微镜下腺癌)的癌检出率(20.3% vs 71.4%)差异有统计学意义(P= 0.003)。16例患者行根治性前列腺切除术,其中13例(81.2%)为临床显著性前列腺癌。结论:针刺活检中ASAP的存在被认为是癌症的重要预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信