A Meta-Analytic Review of Supply Chain Risk Management: Assessing Buffering and Bridging Strategies and Firm Performance

IF 10.2 2区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Journal of Supply Chain Management Pub Date : 2020-01-14 DOI:10.1111/jscm.12219

Pam Manhart, James K. Summers, Jennifer Blackhurst

引用次数: 81

Abstract

Supply chain risk management has received considerable attention as firms experience more frequent and severe impact disruptions. We meta-analytically test the Bode et al. (2011) framework of buffering and bridging supply chain risk management strategies to determine their effect on supply chain risk management. We analyze the supply chain risk management literature to find that both buffering and bridging strategies contribute to supply chain risk management. We also address the benefit of supply chain risk management. Results indicate that supply chain risk management provides a strong contribution to overall firm performance. Additionally, we identify cultural differences of these relationships. Although supply chain risk management strategies may be applied universally, their efficacy varies by culture. In conclusion, we identify and provide guidance for future work.

查看原文本刊更多论文

供应链风险管理的元分析综述:评估缓冲和桥接策略与企业绩效

随着企业经历更频繁和更严重的影响中断，供应链风险管理受到了相当大的关注。我们对Bode等人(2011)缓冲和桥接供应链风险管理策略框架进行了meta分析，以确定其对供应链风险管理的影响。通过对供应链风险管理文献的分析，我们发现缓冲策略和桥接策略都有助于供应链风险管理。我们还讨论了供应链风险管理的好处。研究结果表明，供应链风险管理对企业整体绩效有很大贡献。此外，我们确定了这些关系的文化差异。虽然供应链风险管理策略可以普遍应用，但其效果因文化而异。最后，我们确定并为今后的工作提供指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Supply Chain Management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

16.00

自引率

6.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： ournal of Supply Chain Management Mission: The mission of the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) is to be the premier choice among supply chain management scholars from various disciplines. It aims to attract high-quality, impactful behavioral research that focuses on theory building and employs rigorous empirical methodologies. Article Requirements: An article published in JSCM must make a significant contribution to supply chain management theory. This contribution can be achieved through either an inductive, theory-building process or a deductive, theory-testing approach. This contribution may manifest in various ways, such as falsification of conventional understanding, theory-building through conceptual development, inductive or qualitative research, initial empirical testing of a theory, theoretically-based meta-analysis, or constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory. Theoretical Contribution: Manuscripts should explicitly convey the theoretical contribution relative to the existing supply chain management literature, and when appropriate, to the literature outside of supply chain management (e.g., management theory, psychology, economics). Empirical Contribution: Manuscripts published in JSCM must also provide strong empirical contributions. While conceptual manuscripts are welcomed, they must significantly advance theory in the field of supply chain management and be firmly grounded in existing theory and relevant literature. For empirical manuscripts, authors must adequately assess validity, which is essential for empirical research, whether quantitative or qualitative.