The Woodhull Study Revisited: Nurses' Representation in Health News Media

Nurse author & editor Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1750-4910.2018.TB00016.X

D. Mason, Barbara Glickstein, L. Nixon, Kristi K. Westphaln, Sarah Han, K. Acquaviva

{"title":"The Woodhull Study Revisited: Nurses' Representation in Health News Media","authors":"D. Mason, Barbara Glickstein, L. Nixon, Kristi K. Westphaln, Sarah Han, K. Acquaviva","doi":"10.1111/J.1750-4910.2018.TB00016.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. George Washington University, Washington, DC ; 2. Berkeley Media Studies Group, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA i. Hansen, K.A. (1991). Source diversity and newspaper enterprise journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication, 28(3), 474-482. Society of Professional Journalism (n.d.). Diversity toolkit. Accessed at https://www.spj.org/dtb.asp ii. Women’s Media Center. (2017). The status of women in the U.S. media 2017. Accessed at http://www.womensmediacenter.com/reports/the-status-ofwomen-in-u.s.-media-2017 iii. Global Media Monitoring Project. (2015). United States of America: Global Media Monitoring Project 2015, National Report. Accessed at http://cdn. agilitycms.com/who-makes-the-news/Imported/reports_2015/national/USA.pdf iv. Sigma Theta Tau International. (1998). The Woodhull Study of nursing and the media: Health care’s invisible partner. Indianapolis: STTI. v. US Bureau of Census, Current Population Survey (CPS). (2017). Muench, U., Sindelar, J. & Busch, S.H. (2015). Salary difference between male and female registered nurses in the United States. JAMA, 313(12), 1265-67.","PeriodicalId":77290,"journal":{"name":"Nurse author & editor","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1750-4910.2018.TB00016.X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse author & editor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1750-4910.2018.TB00016.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

1. George Washington University, Washington, DC ; 2. Berkeley Media Studies Group, Public Health Institute, Berkeley, CA i. Hansen, K.A. (1991). Source diversity and newspaper enterprise journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication, 28(3), 474-482. Society of Professional Journalism (n.d.). Diversity toolkit. Accessed at https://www.spj.org/dtb.asp ii. Women’s Media Center. (2017). The status of women in the U.S. media 2017. Accessed at http://www.womensmediacenter.com/reports/the-status-ofwomen-in-u.s.-media-2017 iii. Global Media Monitoring Project. (2015). United States of America: Global Media Monitoring Project 2015, National Report. Accessed at http://cdn. agilitycms.com/who-makes-the-news/Imported/reports_2015/national/USA.pdf iv. Sigma Theta Tau International. (1998). The Woodhull Study of nursing and the media: Health care’s invisible partner. Indianapolis: STTI. v. US Bureau of Census, Current Population Survey (CPS). (2017). Muench, U., Sindelar, J. & Busch, S.H. (2015). Salary difference between male and female registered nurses in the United States. JAMA, 313(12), 1265-67.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Woodhull研究重访:护士在健康新闻媒体中的代表性

1. 乔治华盛顿大学，华盛顿特区;2. 加州伯克利公共卫生研究所伯克利媒体研究小组i Hansen, K.A.(1991)。来源多元化与报纸企业新闻。新闻与大众传播，28(3)，474-482。专业新闻协会(未定日期)。多样性的工具包。访问网址:https://www.spj.org/dtb.asp。妇女媒体中心。(2017)。2017年美国媒体中女性的地位。查阅网址:http://www.womensmediacenter.com/reports/the-status-ofwomen-in-u.s.-media-2017全球媒体监测项目。(2015)。美利坚合众国:2015年全球媒体监测项目，国家报告。访问网址:http://cdn。agilitycms.com/who-makes-the-news/Imported/reports_2015/national/USA.pdf iv.西格玛Theta Tau国际。(1998)。伍德霍尔护理与媒体研究:医疗保健的隐形伙伴。印第安纳波利斯:STTI。诉美国人口普查局，当前人口调查(CPS)。(2017)。Muench, U, Sindelar, J. & Busch, S.H.(2015)。美国男女注册护士的薪酬差异。中华医学杂志，313(12)，1265-67。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nurse author & editor

自引率

0.00%

发文量