Association between Bifidobacteriaceae and the clinical severity of root caries lesions.

M. Mantzourani, Michael R. Fenlon, David Beighton
{"title":"Association between Bifidobacteriaceae and the clinical severity of root caries lesions.","authors":"M. Mantzourani, Michael R. Fenlon, David Beighton","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00470.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/AIMS\nThe isolation of members of the family Bifidobacteriaceae (bifids) from oral samples has been sporadic and a recent cloning study has suggested that they are not detectable in root caries lesions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTo better understand the presence of bifids in root caries we obtained clinical samples (15 of each) from sound exposed root surfaces, leathery remineralizing root lesions, and soft active root lesions. We investigated each for the presence of bifids using a mupirocin-containing selective medium and identified the isolates using 16S recombinant RNA sequencing.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe proportion of bifids, as a percentage of the total anaerobic count, was significantly related to the clinical status of the sites sampled, being 7.88 +/- 1.93 in the infected dentine from soft lesions, 1.61 +/- 0.91 in leathery lesions, and 0.05 +/- 0.39 in plaque from sound exposed root surfaces. Bifids were isolated from all soft lesions, 13 of 15 leathery lesions, and five of the plaque samples. Bifidobacterium dentium was isolated from four of the plaque samples, from 13 samples from leathery lesions, and from 12 of the 15 samples of infected dentine from the soft active lesions. Parascardovia denticolens and Scardovia genomospecies C1 were each isolated from samples associated with all three clinical conditions whereas Scardovia inopicata and Bifidobacterium subtile were both isolated from the infected dentine of the leathery and soft lesions. Bifidobacterium breve was isolated from the infected dentine of soft root caries lesions.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBifids may be routinely isolated from root caries lesions using appropriate cultural methods.","PeriodicalId":19630,"journal":{"name":"Oral microbiology and immunology","volume":"24 1 1","pages":"32-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00470.x","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00470.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS The isolation of members of the family Bifidobacteriaceae (bifids) from oral samples has been sporadic and a recent cloning study has suggested that they are not detectable in root caries lesions. METHODS To better understand the presence of bifids in root caries we obtained clinical samples (15 of each) from sound exposed root surfaces, leathery remineralizing root lesions, and soft active root lesions. We investigated each for the presence of bifids using a mupirocin-containing selective medium and identified the isolates using 16S recombinant RNA sequencing. RESULTS The proportion of bifids, as a percentage of the total anaerobic count, was significantly related to the clinical status of the sites sampled, being 7.88 +/- 1.93 in the infected dentine from soft lesions, 1.61 +/- 0.91 in leathery lesions, and 0.05 +/- 0.39 in plaque from sound exposed root surfaces. Bifids were isolated from all soft lesions, 13 of 15 leathery lesions, and five of the plaque samples. Bifidobacterium dentium was isolated from four of the plaque samples, from 13 samples from leathery lesions, and from 12 of the 15 samples of infected dentine from the soft active lesions. Parascardovia denticolens and Scardovia genomospecies C1 were each isolated from samples associated with all three clinical conditions whereas Scardovia inopicata and Bifidobacterium subtile were both isolated from the infected dentine of the leathery and soft lesions. Bifidobacterium breve was isolated from the infected dentine of soft root caries lesions. CONCLUSION Bifids may be routinely isolated from root caries lesions using appropriate cultural methods.
双歧杆菌科与牙根龋病临床严重程度的关系。
背景/目的从口腔样本中分离到的双歧杆菌科(bifidobacteraceae, bifids)成员是零星的,最近的一项克隆研究表明,它们在牙根龋齿病变中未被检测到。方法为了更好地了解根龋是否存在双裂,我们分别从完好暴露的根面、革质再矿化根损和柔软活动根损中获取临床样本(各15份)。我们使用含有莫匹罗星的选择性培养基研究了每一株双歧杆菌的存在,并使用16S重组RNA测序鉴定了分离株。结果双歧杆菌占总厌氧菌数的比例与不同部位的临床状况有显著相关性,软质性病变感染牙本质为7.88 +/- 1.93,革质性病变为1.61 +/- 0.91,牙菌斑为0.05 +/- 0.39。所有软性病变、15个革质性病变中的13个和5个斑块样本均分离出双歧。从4个牙菌斑样本、13个革质病灶样本和15个软活动病灶感染牙本质样本中的12个样本中分离出牙双歧杆菌。齿状副卡多维亚和卡多维亚基因组种C1分别从与所有三种临床病症相关的样本中分离出来,而绿卡多维亚和细双歧杆菌均从革质和软质病变的感染牙本质中分离出来。从软根龋病感染的牙本质中分离到短双歧杆菌。结论采用适当的培养方法,可常规从牙根龋中分离出双歧杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信